Solved

Cisco ASA 5505 and Cisco Router

Posted on 2015-02-11
3
194 Views
Last Modified: 2015-02-23
Hi,
I have two sites (Site A - 192.168.31.0) and Site B - (192.168.32.0).  One site is in London and the second is in New York.  They are both connected via an MPLS connection.  The site in London has its gateway as the firewall (192.168.31.1) (MPLS router is the gateway in New York) and therefore hairpining was needed to be able to communicate over the MPLS connection (for those users who were onsite at 192.168.31.0 to be able to talk to the users in 192.168.32.0).  This works fine but now I have a problem were users in London want to be able to connect to the site in New York while connected via Client VPN (VPN IP is 191.193.0.100) -  I have added an ACL and included the New York IP in the split tunnel that was already created but I'm still unable to ping New York.

Anyone any ideas?
Cheers
0
Comment
Question by:minniejp
3 Comments
 
LVL 18

Accepted Solution

by:
Akinsd earned 250 total points
ID: 40604789
I don't think you need VPN if the sites were connected by the ISP via MPLS

With that said, do you have route statements for both networks in the router and firewall.

You may need to permit the subnet in the ACL as the incoming interface would most likely have its security level set to zero. Traffic with no presence in the permitted list, whether ACL or policy maps would not be allowed in.

Do a trace route or packet trace first to identify where the traffic is stopping
0
 
LVL 12

Assisted Solution

by:Fidelius
Fidelius earned 250 total points
ID: 40605491
Hello,

If I understand correctly, you have Remote VPN users in London connected to London firewall, and you would like to they can access New York site? Correct me if I'm wrong.
Do you terminate VPN connections and MPLS network on same physical interface?
Can you post sanitized configuration of your firewall?

If you are sure ACLs are OK, I assume problem is in routing. Do you have route for VPN addresses defined in New York router?
You need something like this:
ip route <VPN_pool> <VPN_pool_netmask> <London_FW_MPLS_interface_IP>

Regards!
0
 

Author Comment

by:minniejp
ID: 40625377
routing was the issue, route added and now working as it should.
Cheers
0

Featured Post

ScreenConnect 6.0 Free Trial

Discover new time-saving features in one game-changing release, ScreenConnect 6.0, based on partner feedback. New features include a redesigned UI, app configurations and chat acknowledgement to improve customer engagement!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Tired of waiting for your show or movie to load?  Are buffering issues a constant problem with your internet connection?  Check this article out to see if these simple adjustments are the solution for you.
How to set-up an On Demand, IPSec, Site to SIte, VPN from a Draytek Vigor Router to a Cyberoam UTM Appliance. A concise guide to the settings required on both devices
Both in life and business – not all partnerships are created equal. As the demand for cloud services increases, so do the number of self-proclaimed cloud partners. Asking the right questions up front in the partnership, will enable both parties …
Both in life and business – not all partnerships are created equal. Spend 30 short minutes with us to learn:   • Key questions to ask when considering a partnership to accelerate your business into the cloud • Pitfalls and mistakes other partners…

680 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question