How best to connect multiple Cisco Switches

My small network has been humming along fine with about 45 nodes on a Catalyst 2960S switch for awhile.   We're having a MItel VOIP system put in soon and in order to accommodate all of the IP phones and POE, I've decided to use two Cisco SG300 switches.   My plan is to have all workstations/phones connect to the SG300's and all servers, printers and other devices connect to the 2960.    My question is:

How do I best interconnect these three switches?

Thanks in advance,
LVL 1
Tom FI.T. and Support Staff ManagerAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
Don JohnstonConnect With a Mentor InstructorCommented:
The easiest would be to connect each SG300 to the 2960.  You can use multiple 1g links and channel the links if you need more bandwidth.

But if all three switches are in the same rack, it would been a lot better (from a bandwidth and management perspective) to get additional 2960's and stack them creating a single, larger virtual switch.
0
 
Natty GregIn Theory (IT)Commented:
use truck ports
0
 
Tom FI.T. and Support Staff ManagerAuthor Commented:
@Don, would there be any benefit to also connecting the two sg300's thus creating a loop/triangle?
0
Improved Protection from Phishing Attacks

WatchGuard DNSWatch reduces malware infections by detecting and blocking malicious DNS requests, improving your ability to protect employees from phishing attacks. Learn more about our newest service included in Total Security Suite today!

 
MattCommented:
Do NOT create loop!!!

CISCO 2960S will block port which would cause loop but it also best practice that you NEVER create loop no matter which switch you use. Loop can bring your network down.
0
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
would there be any benefit to also connecting the two sg300's thus creating a loop/triangle?

Not really.  Since the servers are connected to the 2960, that would imply the majority of the traffic would be going to the 2960.  So there's no benefit to having the SG300's connected directly.
0
 
Tom FI.T. and Support Staff ManagerAuthor Commented:
My only concern with just connecting the 300's to the 2960 is that it gives a single point of failure at the 2960.

I suppose I have to balance this with if I were to daisy chain the three and learn all about treespanning in the process.

thanks for the inputs!~
0
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
You don't necessarily have to learn all about spanning tree.  It's on by default and will prevent loops.  You just may have a sub-optimal path in the network.

That said, if all the servers are connected to the 2960, then you already have a single point of failure.

So I think connecting the 300's to the 2960 is still your best approach.
0
 
MattCommented:
Best option would be to have two 2960 switches, stack them together. Then you can connect small switches with 2 links - one to first member of the stack and one to the second member of the stack - so you can have more "bulletproof" network.

Stack also - power supply of the first switch to the one power line, power supply of the second switch to the second power line if you have them of course. And all this protected by UPS.

In this scenario in case of failure on one 2960 switch, you are still "alive".
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.