Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of sunhux
sunhux

asked on

Worth to use Hybrid HDD in USB casing for performance gain vs the usual 2.5" HDD; shockproofing USB HDD

http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Laptop-2-5-Inch-Internal-ST1000LM014/dp/B00B99JUBQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1424452131&sr=8-1&keywords=Seagate+Hybrid+2.5

I'm getting the above Seagate 2.5" Hybrid HDD to be inserted into a USB 3 casing.

Q1:
As this Hybrid HDD is 5400rpm only, will using it in a USB3 casing give at least
10% IO performance compared to using a conventional 5400rpm (those with cache built-in), say the Silicone Power shockproof (& dustproof) one below:
  http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00LN0P5Q0/ref=twister_B00TQOYRGO?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

I plan to use the USB HDD to take backups (Acronis & backing up my data
using Acronis or Robocopy) as well as inserting a HDD into the USB NAS below:
  Pogoplug Series 4 Backup Device:
  http://www.amazon.com/Pogoplug-Series-4-Backup-Device/dp/B006I5MKZY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1424452500&sr=8-1&keywords=Pogo+plug

I suppose the USB NAS Pogoplug could accept direct SATA connection of the
Seagate Hybrid or via a USB3 HDD : I have about 15 GB of Outlook Pst data
to backup to this Pogoplug device as well as Android/iPhones data (daily
incrementals)


Q2:
Can I shock-proof my HDD in a USB3 casing?  Could I just stash up tiny bits
of styrofoam into the USB3 casing?  Or those Silicone Power makers have
special 'paddings' to make their HDD shockproof?  I read Silicone Power
uses conventional Samsung HDD only
SOLUTION
Avatar of arnold
arnold
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of sunhux
sunhux

ASKER

> In the use you envision, there will still be some gains ... the SSD will be used for most of the initial writes during a
>backup ... but not as much as you might think, since there won't be a clear set of "most frequently used" data that
> it retains in the SSD portion.

In fact when I used robocopy to copy a 15GB pst file (from my laptop's full SSD drive) to this hybrid USB drive, it
appears that the readings for the first 5-6GB was increasing a a very rapid rate & then it suddenly slows down:
I'm guessing the SSD buffer on the Hybrid had been filled up & the write operation to the USB suddenly slows
down, correct me if I'm wrong.   Well actually I've ordered this Seagate hybrid, just thinking if I should get
another one or just the shockproof ones.  I'll just test with other normal (non hybrid) USB3 to see if I get
the same behavior
Avatar of sunhux

ASKER

Robocopy gives a % completion reading & it's based on this incrementing reading that I see the write operation
for the first 5-6GB was very fast & then slowed significantly thereafter: not sure if this reading is accurate
Avatar of sunhux

ASKER

Suppose this SSD buffer helps with the write operation, can I presume that after copying a 5GB file to it,
I can detach/Safe Remove the USB device & it will continue to flush what's in its SSD to the normal HDD
in it?
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of sunhux

ASKER

>  Are you contemplating detaching the external as soon as the system indicates the
> copy is complete?
Yes


I've just tried with a conventional USB3 Western Digital HDD & observed that for the
1st 9.9%, the robocopy % incrementing is very fast too & once it hits 10%, it slowed
down.  I'm guessing the WD USB3 has some sort of cache in it too & it gets filled up
& thus slows down.

Hmm, the USB3 with Hybrid Seagate in it slows down after hitting about 30%, so
I guess the larger SSD cache could explains this?  But 30% is about 4.5GB while
the total size of the SSD published by Seagate is 8GB which does explains the
8GB was filled up
Avatar of sunhux

ASKER

>http://www.amazon.com/Pogoplug-Series-4-Backup-Device/dp/B006I5MKZY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1424452500&sr=8-1&keywords=Pogo+plug

I guess with the above USB NAS "Pogoplug" I'm getting, this device may become a
bottleneck so a shockproof HDD could be a better choice.  Anyone knows of any eSATA
HDD that is shockproof as the Pogoplug could support direct eSATA connection?
By adding a USB3 casing to the eSATA HDD, I'm adding another layer (ie USB3) of
overhead to the Pogoplug
Avatar of sunhux

ASKER

Or I'll have to DIY the eSATA HDD to make it shockproof?

I have 3 cases of USB HDDs crashes that the experts in EE can't help
me recover & 3 cases of 2.5" laptops HDDs crashes so just wanted
to avoid these nightmares.  I have got 2 pcs of Silicone Power USB3
HDDs & they have been doing fine without crashes/bad sectors for
the last 1 year (& hope they continue to be so) : to build in a RAID1
/mirror is a bit costly & I'll need a NAS (never seen USB casings that
build in RAID1)
Avatar of sunhux

ASKER

Typo correction
> But 30% is about 4.5GB while  the total size of the SSD published by Seagate is 8GB
> which does explains the 8GB was filled up

=> which does NOT explain the 8GB was filled up
You could use an eSATA case with a large SSD (500GB SSDs are down to ~ $200) if you want a very fast and shockproof setup.