We help IT Professionals succeed at work.
Get Started

SQL 2014 AlwaysOn Failover Clusters

George Perolli
Last Modified: 2016-01-06
We are looking at implementing a SQL cluster and we want to limit data loss if there is a failure.  I realize that using AlwaysOn Availability Groups is a better option, but it is a much more expensive option.  I know that Failover Cluster (FC) uses shared storage and so I will have a single point of failure on the storage.

My big question is if one of my servers fails will I have any data loss?  Another thing that I would like to know is in a FC can I have Server 1 the master of DB1 and Server 2 master of DB2?
Watch Question
Senior Data Architect
This problem has been solved!
Unlock 1 Answer and 6 Comments.
See Answer
Why Experts Exchange?

Experts Exchange always has the answer, or at the least points me in the correct direction! It is like having another employee that is extremely experienced.

Jim Murphy
Programmer at Smart IT Solutions

When asked, what has been your best career decision?

Deciding to stick with EE.

Mohamed Asif
Technical Department Head

Being involved with EE helped me to grow personally and professionally.

Carl Webster
CTP, Sr Infrastructure Consultant
Ask ANY Question

Connect with Certified Experts to gain insight and support on specific technology challenges including:

  • Troubleshooting
  • Research
  • Professional Opinions
Did You Know?

We've partnered with two important charities to provide clean water and computer science education to those who need it most. READ MORE