VLAN Set-up

How do you set-up a VLAN?

I have never done this before and everything I read leads me down the wrong path.
Simply, I need a set of ports (12 ports total) to only allow traffic for 10.0.5.x leaving the rest of the switch to accept traffic for 172.20.1.x. Right now the entire switch will see traffic for both.

The test environment is using an HP ProCurve 2910al 24G Ethernet Switch.

Help!
Robert MohrAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

AkinsdNetwork AdministratorCommented:
I'm trying to figure your request and match it up with features on the switch but I'll explain some things first.
- You can allow or block certain vlans from traversing a switch with "Allowed vlan" configuration on the trunk port connection to other switches.
- You can configure access-lists to block traffic from one vlan to another or  use private vlans to isolate one vlan from another

It seems to me that the access-list option is what you're asking for but I also think you're referring to port assignment. If port assignment, lets assume 10.0.5 network is vlan 10 and 172.20.1 network is vlan 172
Let's also assume there are 48 ports and the 1st 12 ports are to be reserved for vlan 10 and port 48 is your trunk / uplink

You will assign ports 1-12 to vlan 10 and ports 11 to 47 to vlan 172.

By "accepting", did you mean allowing the traffic to come through or devices connected to those ports should communicate on that vlan.
0
Robert MohrAuthor Commented:
My ignorance is the problem. Sorry. I think we want to isolate.

Here's the scenario. For PCI compliance we have to make sure our wireless traffic (10.0.1.x)  is completely segregated from our standard traffic (172.20.1.x).

Our main router has one interface assigned to 172.20.1.x traffic and another interface assigned to 10.0.1.x traffic.
From router we plug in both interface Ethernet cables from two interfaces into HP switch (taking up two ports). We want ports 1-12 to only allow for 172.20.1.x traffic and the remaining ports to allow for 10.0.1.x traffic.  

Based on this I think we want to ISOLATE traffic from one vlan to another on the switch since the vlans are set-up already on the isolated ports on the router.
0
AkinsdNetwork AdministratorCommented:
Ok
There are a few ways that this can be achieved

Option 1. Create access-list that deny traffic between the vlans and apply it either to the vlan interface or the trunk port

Option 2. Make the trunk port a promiscuous port, ports 1-12 isolated ports and the rest community ports


Option 3. Create policy map or vlan map that prevents intercommunication between the 2 vlans
0
Challenges in Government Cyber Security

Has cyber security been a challenge in your government organization? Are you looking to improve your government's network security? Learn more about how to improve your government organization's security by viewing our on-demand webinar!

jburgaardCommented:
You are to use a Procurve sw. like 2910al or some Cisco product fx.?    -I assume: 2910al.
Is the switch in question going to do routing?  -I assume: no ip routing should take place here

If you don't assign an IP to wireless-vlan on the switch, as far as I can see the 2 vlans are separated with ports 1-12 untagged in the wireless-vlan.
With 2 uplinks to main router , the spanning tree protocol could pull your leg.

My guess is , your router rather than the switch is responsible for "Right now the entire switch will see traffic for both."
You could provide output from "show running" for the experts to have a look at.
0
Robert MohrAuthor Commented:
So if I have two upload ports, one that is dedicated to 10.0.1.x and the second one that is 172.20.1.x and I don't want the two to be able to ping each other do I simply tag one group and untag the other? Spanning Tree is turned on.
0
jburgaardCommented:
Tag or untag is about being able to communicate via a switch-port to some other device, configured same manner (or not if not configured same way).
 
You could carry more vlans over one link .
-If you wanted that, then you would differentiate the packets belonging to these vlans by tagging them (eventually untag one vlan). Then there would be no mix of packets belonging to the different vlans, so long the tagging and untag in both ends of the link was made the same way.
It is a quite common to have 2 devices communicate more vlans over one link, and doing so makes spanning tree easier to deal with.
With one link you would have to deal with subinterfaces on the router however.

If the networks can ping each other, then there must exist a routing process making this possible.
Traceroute (in windows : tracert) could show the way the packets travel.
HTH
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Robert MohrAuthor Commented:
This is exactly what we ended up doing. Thank-you for your help!
0
jburgaardCommented:
glad to help
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Switches / Hubs

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.