Comparing Intel processors for web server

we are upgrading servers, and need to compare these to see if it's worth the extra expense for faster performance.
Does anyone have any performance experience for web server usage?


Intel sandy bridge,Xeon E3-1220 4x 3.1Ghz cores, 8M L3 -                         $145.95 (MONTH)
Intel Sandy Bridge Xeon E3 1230, 4x 3.2Ghz cores, 8x HT cores, 8M L3 -  $119.95 (MONTH)
Dual Intel                Xeon E3-2609 8x 2.13Ghz cores, with HT,           $179.95 (MONTH)
willsherwoodAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Seth SimmonsSr. Systems AdministratorCommented:
this will compare the 3 and show the features and differences (if it helps)

http://ark.intel.com/compare/64588,52271,52269
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
willsherwoodAuthor Commented:
Thanks for the comparison link.
I was hoping for a sense of performance "value"
0
andyalderCommented:
That's odd, they're charging more for the 1220 than the 1230 which clocks slightly faster and has hyperthreading available.

It's impossible to spec up a server without knowing what work it's going to do, will there be one page visit per hour or 5000 per second? https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc268240.aspx is a good starting point, it suggests for high volume you need a 4GB of RAM - that's peanuts nowadays. Where he says "a larger cache can yield much better performance overall. " be aware that all processors have large cache compared to what was available when that article was written,

If your current server is doing the job OK you could use https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/313064 to get performance stats off it and then just get another server with similar or better performance.
0
Cloud Class® Course: Amazon Web Services - Basic

Are you thinking about creating an Amazon Web Services account for your business? Not sure where to start? In this course you’ll get an overview of the history of AWS and take a tour of their user interface.

willsherwoodAuthor Commented:
LAMP  (Linux/Apache) server, not huge loads, shared hosting.
sorry i didn't give that detail.
0
andyalderCommented:
Take a look at "Tomcat Sizing Guide for HP ProLiant c-Class Blade Servers" and it'll give you some idea of the ballpark, 1000 user connections 1721.0 requests per second 577ms response. Halve it for a single E3 1230 you'll still manage over 500 requests per second for static pages but that's just the webserver part, you won't pull that many pages off the disks at that speed so the processor will be idling most of the time.

There's always caveats of course, do you need mySQL and on the same box? Encryption is pretty processor intensive if you need SSL.
0
willsherwoodAuthor Commented:
Thank you!
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Server Hardware

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.