We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Sender charges for calling my magicJack Plus service?

I have been using magicJackPlus (MJ+) service for many years using the direct cable connection via my router (and before that magicJack service via my computer). When advising my potential callers about costs to call me (from either land-based telephones or cell phones), I would like to be able to advise them whether any magicJack+ related charges to them are involved.  It seems to me that caller charges would depend solely on the terms and conditions of their respective telephone services.  However, I wonder whether the nature of the magicJack+ VOIP service permits the overall "system" to detect a sender call to my MJ+ number, and use the Internet, rather than the usual telephone media.  If so, then this should render the  caller costs at zero. Can someone please clarify this matter, such that I would be able to provide correct advice to my potential callers?
Appreciatively, Arbyem
Comment
Watch Question

In Theory (IT)
Commented:
I have no knowledge of this instance, since I use magic jack also. The only thing I can think of is the caller do not have long distance on their plan, or they have a pay per use for long distance but if you guys are in the same area code that shouldn't be an issue.

Unless they are still on those old plans where the caller pays, and the recipient does not have to. If that's the case then they need a new plan.

Pay as go are notorious for that.
Bruce MORRISColonel (Retired)

Author

Commented:
Hi nattygreg: Thanks for the quick response.
Actually, I am trying to determine what happens when a caller dials my magicJack+ number, when the caller is outside of my area code (613 wherever I am located, since I use my MJ+ everywhere I travel with direct access to a router CAT5 cable connection).  It seems logical that how the caller end is handled is dependent on the the caller's telephone plan.  
I am interested in knowing why the "system" would not permit the "699" MJ+ exchange to be detected, and thence rout the call directly to the Internet (VOIP).  If that could be technically achievable, then, presumably, there would be no long-distance charges involved at all!
As I mentioned, I would like to be able to advise my potential callers, that dialling my MJ+ number would not incur any LD charges at the caller end.
Appreciatively, Arbyem
Bruce MORRISColonel (Retired)

Author

Commented:
I still do not have a satisfactory answer. Hence, I will remind my potential callers to beware that long-distance charges are dependant on senderr's telephone plan contract.