sXmont1j6
asked on
Upgrading Exchange Environment for fail-over\redundancy
Hello,
We are in the process upgrading our current exchange environment to provide for more flexibility, manageability, increased performance, etc... I put this question up to take some advise and opinions, here are some details.
Current Config.
230 mailboxes, 70ish distribution lists, 500+GB DB size, 1 Exchange 2010 Server running on VMware, Server 2008 R2, Storage on P2000 SAN. RAID 10, SAS 300 Drives.
We now have 3 hosts connected to the P2000 and have introduced a second enclosure with more SAS drives.
We would like to do the following:
Split up the Database?
Multiple Exchange Servers for different roles spread across the three hosts. ?
How many DBs, different LUNS?
Any other ideas you suggest?
If you have questions for me, feel free to ask.
We are in the process upgrading our current exchange environment to provide for more flexibility, manageability, increased performance, etc... I put this question up to take some advise and opinions, here are some details.
Current Config.
230 mailboxes, 70ish distribution lists, 500+GB DB size, 1 Exchange 2010 Server running on VMware, Server 2008 R2, Storage on P2000 SAN. RAID 10, SAS 300 Drives.
We now have 3 hosts connected to the P2000 and have introduced a second enclosure with more SAS drives.
We would like to do the following:
Split up the Database?
Multiple Exchange Servers for different roles spread across the three hosts. ?
How many DBs, different LUNS?
Any other ideas you suggest?
If you have questions for me, feel free to ask.
I would start with Exchange 2010 Server Role Requirements Calculator from https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/office/Exchange-2010-Mailbox-Server-Role-
ASKER
I get that but I am looking for some real world recommendations. Not MS technet. Any suggestions would be great
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.