failover in AG (SQL 2012)- manual-vs-auto

ASynchronous (between primary & secondary) AG does not allow automatic failovers? is there any trick to still make the auto failover to happen in ASynchronous  mode and avoid the situation of needing manual failovers?
LVL 5
25112Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

 
Vitor MontalvãoMSSQL Senior EngineerCommented:
No and no.
0
 
25112Author Commented:
so, we just have to be mentally prepared to do manual failover all the time with AG, if we prefer the benefits of Asynchronous  (faster)? That seems to be a 'con' or downside? Is this why Synchronous is perhaps best use of AG?
0
 
Vitor MontalvãoMSSQL Senior EngineerCommented:
Let call it "feature" :)
Is how Microsoft built it. I believe is because of limitations on the Asynchronous method. The usual landscape is to set a Synchronous copy for High Availability and Asynchronous for Disaster and Recovery.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by ConnectWise

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
 
25112Author Commented:
good point.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.