Is SSD read cache going to help?

Have a Hyper-V environment - 4 hosts sharing a single Powervault md3800f with 10 x 15k SAS in RAID10 connected via redundant fibre channel.

Average IOPS, latency, throughput, queue depths etc. all very much acceptable and actually lower than expected.  But I'm seeing regular spikes and the odd complaint of slowdowns.

I've noticed on the SAN that it's showing 100% write cache hit but most of the time less than 50% read cache hit.

So would we benefit from putting in an SSD drive to use as read cache, bearing in mind that the read percentage is around 40% ?
LVL 1
devon-ladAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Dr. KlahnPrincipal Software EngineerCommented:
Will you benefit?  Yes.  With more read cache, no matter where it is located, the read latency will decrease and the physical drives will execute fewer seeks.

Will the benefit affect your operations?  Probably not, if it is already acceptable.  If it were unacceptable, that would be a different situation.

Is it worth the money?  The big question.  Unfortunately, only you can answer that.

Do remember that even SSDs fail. When an SSD used for caching fails, it is a situation far out of the ordinary, it is completely unexpected, and thus it may be difficult to figure out where in the storage subsystem the problem is located.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
devon-ladAuthor Commented:
Hmm...just got a quote back from Dell...£3500 just for the premium feature key.  This is part of the high performance tier feature.  Then there's the drives on top of that.  Might end up paying more than the original price for the SAN!

Just reading the associated documentation for the high performance tier and wondering if we're not getting the best out of the base system.  Generally the SAN hasn't been tweaked out of the box - so this might be the first place to start looking.
0
devon-ladAuthor Commented:
I've just noticed something I don't quite understand.

The disk latency on a particular VM is jumping up to around 700ms at times.

Yet at the same time the SAN is reporting a maximum latency of 40ms on the virtual disk that the host is using.

Virtual disk is not shared, all VHDs are on the same virtual disk.

Where have those 660ms gone?
0
devon-ladAuthor Commented:
Ok - I'm going off topic a bit.  Specific question has been answered so I'll move to another post.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Storage

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.