sub netting

currently I have:
192.168.94.0 /24

as per router, dhcp has 192.168.94.200 - 254. isn't that 54 usable ips available ?

only less than 25 network devices (workstation/servers/network printers) on this subnet.

my client wants to increase to 100 available ips... does that make sense?

please advise,

thank you,

mwauki
mwaukiSystems EngineerAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

David Johnson, CD, MVPOwnerCommented:
why you aren't using a 192.168.94.0 / 24 and give them the full 255 and be done with it. I can see no reason to not make the full 255 available. It doesn't hurt.
0
mwaukiSystems EngineerAuthor Commented:
I am using the 192.168.94.0, just that it starts from 200-254.

would it work if I statically assigned from 1-199?
0
David Johnson, CD, MVPOwnerCommented:
you understand about making address reservations for static ip addresses?
0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

mwaukiSystems EngineerAuthor Commented:
yes... have done that with network printers/scanners and servers as well, on the dhcp server scoop.  is that what you referring to?
0
QlemoBatchelor, Developer and EE Topic AdvisorCommented:
There are two views to it:
a) Use a reserved area of addresses for fixed IPs (printers, scanners, servers, ...), and set up DHCP to use the remainder. This is as you have it, but with a very small DHCP range.
b) Have the complete scope in DHCP, and assign static IPs per reservations as stated above. This is more flexible, as you have the complete IP range at hand.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
mwaukiSystems EngineerAuthor Commented:
thanks, Qlemo.
0
mwaukiSystems EngineerAuthor Commented:
ok. so here is what i did:
leave the pool 200-254 alone and just statically assigned any new devices.  for now, i will stick with this.

thanks,
all..
0
mwaukiSystems EngineerAuthor Commented:
thanks for the hints....
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
DHCP

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.