Server 2008 R2 in non-domain mode that allows for more than 2 RDP Users. Is it hacked?
I've been asked to look at a server that is configured as a standalone machine.
It is part of a workgroup.
Active Directory is not installed.
Terminal Services does not appear to be installed
It allows more than 2 RDP users
I thought that Server forced you to run as a domain controller or part of a domain or was that just 2003?
I thought that Terminal Services was required to allow more than 2 RDP Users.
Is this Server licensed properly? Is it hacked somehow to allow more RDP Users?
It allows for more than 2
It is part of a workgroup.
Active Directory is not installed.
Terminal Services does not appear to be installed
It allows more than 2 RDP users
I thought that Server forced you to run as a domain controller or part of a domain or was that just 2003?
I thought that Terminal Services was required to allow more than 2 RDP Users.
Is this Server licensed properly? Is it hacked somehow to allow more RDP Users?
It allows for more than 2
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Can you have three active sessions at the same time?
ASKER
I think so. Usually when there is a 2 person restriction, the 3rd can't login until one of the others logs out. Even if they are disconnected.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
I've requested that this question be closed as follows:
Accepted answer: 0 points for MJCS's comment #a40833834
Assisted answer: 250 points for akb's comment #a40833612
Assisted answer: 250 points for Lee W, MVP's comment #a40833819
for the following reason:
Figured out answer through trial
Accepted answer: 0 points for MJCS's comment #a40833834
Assisted answer: 250 points for akb's comment #a40833612
Assisted answer: 250 points for Lee W, MVP's comment #a40833819
for the following reason:
Figured out answer through trial
I object to this question being closed without allocating points.
My initial comment was correct.
My initial comment was correct.
ASKER
I split points between you and Lee. Did you think I should have given all of them to you?
Not at all. Thanks for the points. I was sent an email saying you wanted to close the question without allocating points.
ASKER
oh ok.
ASKER