HP 3800 distributed trunking

Hi,

Hoping someone could shed some light on this subject as extensive reading doesn't give a clear answer.

I need to have resilience in case of switch failure and also use the bandwidth
I have 2 x HP 3800 switches. I have my core HP servers in the same rack. I plan on using 1 server NIC for each switch (using 2 in total)   I will be bonding the server NICs using mode 4 (they are Linux servers)

Question:  Do I need to use stacking modules or can I just run 1gb connection between 2 of the switch ports to 'join' the 2 switches?
Does using stacking ports make the resilience better?

Regards
nik middletondirectorAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Zephyr ICTCloud ArchitectCommented:
So it's basically stacking vs trunking (LAG), stacking should in theory be faster because it can use the complete speed of the backplane as well as give you benefit in ease of management (depending on the stacking technology) because you'll have only 1 configuration to maintain as the stacked switches will behave as 1.

I'd say resilience wise their is less of a difference, but I'm thinking still a benefit for stacking.

If I had the choice I'd go for stacking.

Now for all disclosure, this is a generalization, I haven't read up on this particular switch, but it's mostly the case concerning stacking
nociSoftware EngineerCommented:
You cannot build a Trunk spanning two independent switches,
So stacking is required if you want to use two different switches to connect one server to.
nik middletondirectorAuthor Commented:
According to HP's docs, Distributed trunking does exactly that.  My question was, is stacking mandatory for best performance/reliability ?  So much about stacking just seems to mention it's only 1 switch to manage and that's the main USP
Zephyr ICTCloud ArchitectCommented:
Performance wise stacking is still the winner, from the HP 3800 switch quickspecs:

High performance stacking:
provides up to 336 Gb/s of stacking throughput; each 4 port stacking module can
support up to 42 Gb/s in each direction per stacking port

To achieve that without stacking would be a feat ... So while it's not mandatory for reliability, it's still the best in performance.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Switches / Hubs

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.