Routing Issue with two G.SHDSL HWICs in a Cisco 1841

I am  trying to configure an 1841 Router with 2 G.SHDSL HWICs , to route request directed to internet, the issue is that I m tryiing to route some origin subnets to one Dialer (Dialer0) and for now the same subnet trough the other HWIC(Dialer2),  but later i'll  be adding other subnets and load balance between both . the show ip nat translations, show that the translations are been made trough the two interfaces, differentiating traffic by a route map inside each ip nat inside statement , but i think that the problem is that the two default route but to different destination interfaces ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dialer 0 , ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dialer 1. The config works fine for one router statement or one dialer at a time if the correct ip route is deactivated with "no ip route" or I just remove the "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer2" or " ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0" I google it and find an interesting solution a little bit different as it as to do with adsl  and many subnet , when for now I only have one subnet coming from a smart switch . But I need first to have the routing using those both hwic to work before I begun to  build different subnet ,

I tried to add the PBR and route Map entry but unfortunately he didn't work and in the sample that I find it was from a sys.ad who had the same problem and adding the route map and PRB make it work so i must be missing something, he was using PPoE when I am using PPoA  but I don't see that be the problem .

Can any body help me with this issue or  show me what I am missing ?

Best Regards !

Alan
1841-PPoE-conf-with-PBR.txt
hiramlightAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

JustInCaseCommented:
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

route-map split-traffic permit 10
description "Route MAP NAT DIALER0"
match ip address 100
set interface Dialer0
!
route-map split-traffic permit 20
description "Route MAP NAT DIALER1"
match ip address 101
set interface Dialer1
Your access-list 100 and 101 are the same, so route-map will always match to first statement, and  all traffic will always go to dialer0 if traffic does not match first statement (than it will not match second statement either) it will be forwarded by default route.

you could create ACL for half of your hosts (or something like that - depending on how your hosts IP addresses are spread) If you want to split that IP range to Dialer0 and Dialer1
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.127 any
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.128 0.0.0.127 any
this should forward hosts 1 - 127 through Dialer0, and 128 - 254 through Dialer1

I guess that you understand that traffic between fa0/0 and fa0/1 is dead if you don't change your route-maps :)
1

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
hiramlightAuthor Commented:
So sorry for such a long reply , my step Mum passed away had to go back home to Mississippi , but ya I come up with the same solution so only fair you get the points . Thank's a lot . Alan
0
hiramlightAuthor Commented:
HI Predrag ,

I am not using  fa0/1  yet but  What do you meant by this ....

"I guess that you understand that traffic between fa0/0 and fa0/1 is dead if you don't change your route-maps :)  "

but If I need it how should I change my route-maps..?

thank's
0
JustInCaseCommented:
Well, let's say that you have network 192.168.0.0/24 in your network beside 192.168.1.0/24.
You can create access list 102 and put it on top of other statements:

access-list 102 permit ip  192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255

route-map split-traffic permit 5
description "Route MAP NAT DIALER0"
match ip address 102
!
route-map split-traffic permit 10
description "Route MAP NAT DIALER0"
match ip address 100
set interface Dialer0
!
route-map split-traffic permit 20
description "Route MAP NAT DIALER1"
match ip address 101
set interface Dialer1

And if you don't configure set statement, it will use routing table for forwarding packets.
0
hiramlightAuthor Commented:
oh ok  right I I'll do that as I want to make some change on the network setup and use both fa .

Tthank's a lot Predrag, Had to go back home again, those RT ( KL , New O )  begun to affect me ... tired ,,!  but Family come first always

Cheer's

Alan
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.