Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of leblanc
leblanc

asked on

REdistribute BGP to OSPF

My WAN connection is going through a private MPLS network. My layer 3 core switch is BGP peering with my ISP CE router. My core is also connecting to a FW for the backup internet. I am using 2 floating static default routes with higher AD route next-hop to the FW.

Now I am in the process of adding a router to the setup. So the router will take the function of the WAN router. BGP peering from the core will be moving to the WAN router. I am thinking of configuring OSPF between my WAN router and my core switch. So my questions are:
- Should I redistribute BGP into OSPF on the WAN router? My WAN is using MPLS VPN so I only see the routes from my remote sites via BGP.
- If redistribution is necessary, will my failover with the floating static default routes still work?
- If I don't redistribute, how will this whole thing work? Will it work?
Avatar of asavener
asavener
Flag of United States of America image

I would suggest that the size of the network does not justify the additional complexity of multiple routing protocols.
Avatar of leblanc
leblanc

ASKER

I do not have a choice as far as the BGP is concerned on the WAN side. For my internal network, instead of doing static routes, I was thinking dynamic routing for ease of management.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of harbor235
harbor235
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of leblanc

ASKER

I was planning to have a default route pointed to the MPLS CE router from my WAN router. Also, on the WAN router, configure BGP on the WAN link interface and OSPF with default-information originate on the internal interface. the default-information statement is to advertise my default route to my OSPF neighbor.
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Without seeing your architecture i am guessing here,

Do you have a diagram of your setup? stick drawing would be fine.


harbor235 ;-}
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of leblanc

ASKER

Plz see attached.

User generated image
Who are you dealing with that they require you to register your internal addresses?  

MPLS should be completely private, and the provider has no need to understand your address space or topology.  The provider can and probably does have other customers that overlap your address space, but neither you nor they should care.
I see now, why not do the following:

2911 CE2 advertises prefixes for ASN 30 and 40 to MPLS cloud
2911 CE1 advertises prefixes for ASN 10 and 20 (DIO would do this too)
2621 advertises BGP DIO, also here is where I would advertise OSPF into BGP
2911 FW advertises DIO into OSPF

Get the picture, hopefully I did not miss something. Would be allot easier if you connected all ASNs to the MPLS cloud. Are you paying for private peering connections between sites as well?

asavener:
MPLS can be private if you like, that does not preclude you from using assigned address space. In fact most customers use assigned address space , many organizations like to avoid NAT if possible.

The provider carriers all customer routes so its pretty easy to see customer networks. I agree that with MPLS you can have IP address range overlap, but if you have IP space and you do not want to NAT why go through the pain.  Many organizations use RFC1918 everywhere and with little planning, in many cases it becomes difficult to use. Just my thoughts.

harbor235 ;}
Avatar of leblanc

ASKER

I do not need to redistribute OSPF into BGP. My question was around the BGP to OSPF redistribution at the 2911 WAN routers. It seems not necessary to me. That is why I ask if this is typical for a private MPLS to redistribute BGP into OSPF.

The MPLS is private. They advertise our private IP subnets within their BGP.
According to your diagram I do not see where your WAN 2911s are members of any OSPF routing domain. I assume you use BGP to exchange routes with your MPLS provider? I assume 2911 WAN routers to be the 2911 MPLS routers?

It is more common to redistribute iBGP routes into an IGP, however, If you do not have many eBGP routes then it would be fine to redistribute BGP into OSPF. Redistributing routes into OSPF will assign all routes as external type 2 routes which in case of route decision making is less preferred than non external type routes.

In your diagram the OSPF speakers are 2911FW, 3560,2621, 2911 WAN-remote, 3560.

Sounds like you have a good grasp whats going on, your architecture is single threaded so you should be fine.

harbor235 ;}
Avatar of leblanc

ASKER

Yes. The 2911 MPLS routers are the provider routers. We are EBGP between their 2911 and my WAN 2911. I just don't see any advantage to redistribute BGP to OSPF on my WAN 2911 router. Unless you guys see the advantages. Thanks.
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of leblanc

ASKER

Let me try.