Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.
J6000 servers with HPUnix 10.2 OS
I was wondering if someone has the recommended patches for a fresh install of HPunix 10.2 on a J6000 Server? We will be running one application with the following scripting languages and protocols: ksh, csh, ftp , NFS, Xdmcp, and telnet. And I wonder if it is possible to get the original C/C++ ansi compiler for 10.2 with Motif 1.0 to 1.2?
Regards and Thanks,
Regards and Thanks,
Who is Participating?
Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by
Enjoy your complimentary solution view.
Get every solution instantly with premium.
Start your 7-day free trial.
I wear a lot of hats...
"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.
I will check out NetBSD; however, the white pages and the migration cook books I could not find.
Thanks and Regards,
Thanks and Regards,
Docs are out of HP site for last 10 years...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP-UX
If you have tape of HP-UX 10.30 go for it, if not, there are problems preventing older systems from running after Y2K.
Modern XDMCP is called spice or freenx, and telnet and ftp are under hood of SSH....
As much as NetBSD is concerned you can do some target practice installing it on a desktop virtual machine with amd64 version.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP-UX
If you have tape of HP-UX 10.30 go for it, if not, there are problems preventing older systems from running after Y2K.
Modern XDMCP is called spice or freenx, and telnet and ftp are under hood of SSH....
As much as NetBSD is concerned you can do some target practice installing it on a desktop virtual machine with amd64 version.
Thanks.
We have two major pieces of software to move over. We have the installations software (Client-Server application and Data Reduction Application) for both, and we have the full source code for the main application (Data Reduction Application). The main application needs some the functionality of the other.
When I had time I was trying to Compile the application on Fedora-64bit but I had to install some Open source "Motif" libraries and there are some Syntax differences between Version 1 to Version 2 and there is where I stopped so far. But NetBSD seems to have the Motif already installed which will help if I need to set-up new systems as we progress.
Regards,
We have two major pieces of software to move over. We have the installations software (Client-Server application and Data Reduction Application) for both, and we have the full source code for the main application (Data Reduction Application). The main application needs some the functionality of the other.
When I had time I was trying to Compile the application on Fedora-64bit but I had to install some Open source "Motif" libraries and there are some Syntax differences between Version 1 to Version 2 and there is where I stopped so far. But NetBSD seems to have the Motif already installed which will help if I need to set-up new systems as we progress.
Regards,
In fedora or centos that will be openmotif
Dont say it is open source, vendor supplied source, thats it.
32bit might be better than 64bit for compilation (Look at CentOS 6 32bit) (e.g. int || 0xffffffff)
HP-PA might be better too for register layout more like PA-RISC (e.g. int32|| 0xffff0000)
In addition try alternative compilers to gcc
Centos: pcc is of age of your machines, clang may remember old C better
NetBSD PA-RISC: tendra is another relic from stone ages
Dont say it is open source, vendor supplied source, thats it.
32bit might be better than 64bit for compilation (Look at CentOS 6 32bit) (e.g. int || 0xffffffff)
HP-PA might be better too for register layout more like PA-RISC (e.g. int32|| 0xffff0000)
In addition try alternative compilers to gcc
Centos: pcc is of age of your machines, clang may remember old C better
NetBSD PA-RISC: tendra is another relic from stone ages
Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by
Your issues matter to us.
Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.
Start your 7-day free trial
I have Centos Installed on a virtual machine. Tomorrow I can check the version. I have been using gcc. I will check out the PCC and clang.
Remeber -Wall parameter - every piece of code flagged with warning has to be reviewed...
32bit OS is closer approximation of J6000 CPU.
32bit OS is closer approximation of J6000 CPU.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Unix OS
From novice to tech pro — start learning today.
Question has a verified solution.
Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.
Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.
Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by
Enjoy your complimentary solution view.
Get every solution instantly with premium.
Start your 7-day free trial.
Print out this page and hang on the wall:
http://www.hp.com/softwarereleases/releases-media2/discon/5967-3556.htm
And get some modern system to keep old machine in company museum:
https://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/hp700/