nerworking ccna question

Hi all please help me in this question :-
The network administrator is asked to configure 113 point-to-point links. Which IP addre
scheme best defines the address range and subnet mask that meet the requirement and
the fewest subnet and host addresses?
A. subnetted with mask
B. subnetted with mask
C. subnetted with mask
D. subnetted with mask
E. subnetted with mask

Please explain me why D is correct
viggo amuroAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

For any point-to-point link you will waste 4 IP addresses (mask

- network address
- 2 hosts
- broadcast address

113*4 = 452

First network that support that many hosts is /23 = 512 addresses

A. - too big - 16382 addresses
B. - not enough addresses - 128
C. - not enough addresses - 256
D. - best fit - 512 addresses
E. - too big - 65536 addresses
viggo amuroAuthor Commented:
hi, you wrote that for ny point-to-point link you will waste 4 IP addresses (mask, where did you get 4?
- network address
- 2 hosts
- broadcast address

First subnet - network address - host 1 - host 2 - broadcast address
Total 4 addresses
Next subnet - network address .....  etc ....
Powerful Yet Easy-to-Use Network Monitoring

Identify excessive bandwidth utilization or unexpected application traffic with SolarWinds Bandwidth Analyzer Pack.

Easy to know number of IP addresses in subnet if you have decimal notation, quick and dirty:

Since we already have
last digit is 252
max number of ip addresses is 256 (255 (1 to 155) + 1 (for 0) = 256)
256 - 252 = 4 IP addresses
2 belong to network address and broadcast
so that leaves you with 2 hosts per subnet :)

You can apply the same logic to
16 addresses
14 hosts per subnet

Logic for would be
256 - 240 = 16 addresses
0 on the end 256 addresses
16 * 256 = 4096 addresses
2 addresses network and broadcast
4094 hosts per subnet
viggo amuroAuthor Commented:
Predrag, thanks i got first part.
But i still can't understand how you get the number of addresses on each variant (16382,128,256....)?
/16 - subnet mask         = binary 11111111.11111111.00000000.0000000
/18 - subnet mask     = binary 11111111.11111111.11000000.0000000
/24 - subnet mask     = binary 11111111.11111111.11111111.0000000
/25 - subnet mask = binary 11111111.11111111.11111111.1000000
/23 - subnet mask     = binary 11111111.11111111.11111110.0000000
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
The (correct) provided address space has 9 bits available.  Total address is 32-bits and subtract the network portion of 23-bits (32-23=9).  When you decide to use two of those bits for hosts, that leaves 7-bits for the subnets.  With 7-bits, you can have 128 subnets which is sufficent for the 113 in the question.

BTW, when you use a /30 mask and have a 2-bit host field, you don't "waste" four addresses.  Two of the addresses are actually used while the other two define the network and broadcast.  So IMHO, only two addresses are "wasted". The other two are used.
viggo amuroAuthor Commented:
Predrag, i meant these nembers 16382, 128,256, 512, 65536.
That is what you need to learn, how to get those.

/25 - subnet mask = binary 11111111.11111111.11111111.1000000
Leading 1s are network part of address, host portion is part with 0.
So you have 7 bits for host part.
7 bits is 2**7 = 128

The same way
/16 - subnet mask         = binary 11111111.11111111.00000000.0000000
Leading 1s are network part of address (16 in this case), host part is 16 bits (part with zeroes)
16 bits  is 2**16 = 65536

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
viggo amuroAuthor Commented:
Thanks Buddy, now i get it, i was confused by question itself, Thanks !!!
You're welcome.
They will try to confuse you on the exam the same way, read carefully EVERY word.
viggo amuroAuthor Commented:
Ok, promise ;)
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.