SKGLUFC
asked on
SQL Server Std - OS + best practice
Hi all...
SQL Server 2014 Std BE / Access 2010 FE
Regarding the OS that SQL server resides on.... So if we are deploying an in house solution that has say 35 users on a lan and 5 remote users does it make any difference the OS that the SQL Server resides on? Does it need to be a server OS or can i use a std windows 7 / 8.1 etc as the OS?
Is it also best practice to seperate the SQL server away from the main windows server that controls the domain and stores the networked files?
Its just that we are upgrading our main file server in the next few months to a beast of a machine and im wondering if im best in either virtulising the new server or utilising the old server as a SQL server machine only?
Finally has anyone seen much performance gain from using SSD's in the PC that runs the SQL Server?
Many thanks..
Cheers
Steve
SQL Server 2014 Std BE / Access 2010 FE
Regarding the OS that SQL server resides on.... So if we are deploying an in house solution that has say 35 users on a lan and 5 remote users does it make any difference the OS that the SQL Server resides on? Does it need to be a server OS or can i use a std windows 7 / 8.1 etc as the OS?
Is it also best practice to seperate the SQL server away from the main windows server that controls the domain and stores the networked files?
Its just that we are upgrading our main file server in the next few months to a beast of a machine and im wondering if im best in either virtulising the new server or utilising the old server as a SQL server machine only?
Finally has anyone seen much performance gain from using SSD's in the PC that runs the SQL Server?
Many thanks..
Cheers
Steve
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Thanks guys for the responses, sorry for the delay in replying, i have had limited emails for the last few weeks while on holiday.
Cheers
Steve
Cheers
Steve
Microsoft's Non-server OS's usually have connection limits on the order of 10 to 20 users at a time. I found a table from Microsoft showing the limits but I can't find it right now.
ASKER
Thanks Dave..
Yes i remember that from a few years ago when i was running a access be on a std windows OS.
Thanks
Steve
Yes i remember that from a few years ago when i was running a access be on a std windows OS.
Thanks
Steve
The physical storage, be it local hard drive or a SAN configuration, will be always the weakest link when it comes to the overall performance and usually the bottleneck. But again, if the usage is not high enough I don't think the SSD really justify when there are still more classic had drives approaches that will do the job just fine. Of course that the SSDs will perform much better but it is not necessary in this scenario. On the other hand if the money is not a problem then why not... :)
Virtualization. If you will get a "beast" of a machine then it would be kind of waste of resources to be only used with a single purpose, again, under that usage scenario. Beside that there are advantages to virtualization that you do not have with a stand alone machine.
So the answer is that is relative to what your purpose and usage is and that you can go for different solutions as long as they will fit your needs.