I have a switch that supports jumbo frames (9014) and my 10 Gbe NICS support the exact same (9014).
I can ping 10.20.30.100 -f -l 8000 without a problem but my speeds tend to be slower with Jumbo Frames enabled.
I am just doing a file copy from a 2012R2 Server to a 2012R2 SMB 3.0 file share.
I use SMBmultichannelConstraint to assure that it is using the correct NIC.
I get as high as 9.3 Gbps without Jumbo Frames enabled but I only get about 7.1 Gbps WITH Jumbo Frames enabled.
Any ideas Experts?
VMwareWindows Server 2012Switches / HubsNetworkingRouters
Last Comment
K B
8/22/2022 - Mon
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
This is quite normal, there is no guarantee, that enabling jumbo frames, will make traffic faster.
You may want to experiment, with the size you have defined, e.g. try an MTU of 4000 or 8000, rather than 9014.
Jumbo Frames are frames which are larger than 1500.
Also you may find that the bottle neck could be elsewhere, or you are not full optimizing the link.
Gauthier
Normally, the only way jumbo frame could slow transfer speed is if the error rate on the link is high.
That said, File copy is a rather high level test, you should test link speed with a dedicated utility to see if the problem is effectively at the network stack or elsewhere.
Don Johnston
Ping is not a good performance indicator for transfer speed.
I get as high as 9.3 Gbps without Jumbo Frames enabled but I only get about 7.1 Gbps WITH Jumbo Frames enabled.
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
and also it depends on the physical switch, in a recent conversation with Dell Networking, they advised us, that MTU size, should match the recommended figure designed for the Dell physical switch.
In this case with Dell, they suggested a figure of 9018! was the magic MTU for this Dell switch.
K B
ASKER
on an empty 5.5 TB Raid 6 Array as the SMB 3.0 destination for the file transfer..
I copy one folder with 21.2 GB (64 Files, 5 Folders) I get anywhere between 9 Gbps to 4 Gbps.
if I copy the same folder (renamed) I get slower speeds
If I copy one 22 GB file it is fairly high 9 GB to a quick dip to 3.8 GB
If I copy it (renamed) it is consistently slower at 9 GB but mainly 7 GB rates.
With such a huge array.. why does the file transfer rate decrease when I add files? We are only talking 22 GB out of 5.5 TB.
Has the performance degradation been a red herring? It would also be interessing if you changed the MTU, and what the rates are with and without Jumbo frames, just for the files.
K B
ASKER
I am realizing that I had the connections for the test set to more than one.. When I just use 1 connection it is a steady 6Gbps. arggh
You may want to experiment, with the size you have defined, e.g. try an MTU of 4000 or 8000, rather than 9014.
Jumbo Frames are frames which are larger than 1500.
Also you may find that the bottle neck could be elsewhere, or you are not full optimizing the link.