<div>
In this case, egress.<br />
<br />
The infrastructure is Cisco switch to switch, and will be tagged via dot1q. &nbsp;From my example, I was just curious if traffic would still be forwarded in VLAN 30 since its configured on both physical and logical interfaces, where VLANs 20 &amp;&nbsp;40 wouldn't be able to forward traffic through the 'port-channel' since both are configured on only one side (VLAN 20 only on physical trunk, VLAN 40 only on port-channel). &nbsp;<br />
<br />
If anything would VLAN 20 would still forward traffic through the physical trunks even though the physical interfaces are part of the channel group where it VLAN 20 isn't configured within the port-channel's trunk? &nbsp;I can see VLAN 40 not forwarding, but I'm more curious about the situation of VLAN 20. &nbsp;<br />
<br />
Also, would VLAN 30 forward traffic even though VLAN 20 &amp;&nbsp;40 are misconfigured, or is this an 'all-or-nothing' situation. &nbsp;<br />
<br />
Port-channel 1<br />
&nbsp;switchport mode trunk<br />
&nbsp;switchport trunk allowed vlan 30<br />
<br />
inter g1/1 - x<br />
&nbsp;switchport mode trunk<br />
&nbsp;switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,30,40<br />
&nbsp;channel-group 1 mode on<br />
<br />
Another way I'd ask is, &quot;is the switch smart enough to still forward traffic if its misconfigured, or would it just break, and not do anything until its corrected?&quot;<br />
<br />
Thanks!
</div>


<div>
<div class="content wysiwyg-content">
If you configure an interface (g0/1) as a trunk to allow VLANs 20,30 and a port-channel interface (port-ch1), which g0/1 &amp;&nbsp;gx/x will be apart of (channel-group) to allow VLANs 30,40, would there be an issue with traffic being forwarded from VLANs 20 and 40 since they are only configured on one side (physical side-g0/1 vs logical side-portchannel). I'm not putting this into production, I'm just curious to see if it works. &nbsp;VLAN 30 should be fine since its configured on both interfaces, but what about VLAN 20&amp;40?
</div>
</div>


If you configure an interface (g0/1) as a trunk to allow VLANs 20,30 and a port-channel interface (port-ch1), which g0/1 & gx/x will be apart of (channel-group) to allow VLANs 30,40, would there be an issue with traffic being forwarded from VLANs 20 and 40 since they are only configured on one side (physical side-g0/1 vs logical side-portchannel). I'm not putting this into production, I'm just curious to see if it works.  VLAN 30 should be fine since its configured on both interfaces, but what about VLAN 20&40?

Port-channel Question

Networking is the process of connecting computing devices, peripherals and terminals together through a system that uses wiring, cabling or radio waves that enable their users to communicate, share information and interact over distances. Often associated are issues regarding operating systems, hardware and equipment, cloud and virtual networking, protocols, architecture, storage and management.

Networking

NetScaler is the industry’s leading web and application delivery controller that maximizes the performance and availability of all applications and data, and also provide secure remote access to any application from any device type. NetScaler products are easily selected by determining the edition providing functional needs and the appropriate physical or virtual appliance platform to fulfill performance needs.