We help IT Professionals succeed at work.
Get Started

Troubleshooting NDR - Exchange 2010

vudoox asked
Last Modified: 2016-03-02
We recently moved to a new ISP.  I'm wondering if we are now getting this message because the new ISP has no PTR record or if it's because there is a misspelling here.  And if it's because of the misspelling, is that on the general tab of the receive connector to change this?  The misspelling that I'm referring to is on line 8.  I've redacted the actual domain, but there's a letter missing there.  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: spam.domain.com
filter1.domain2.com #<filter1.domain2.com #5.0.0 smtp; 554 IP name lookup failed. No PTR record found> #SMTP#
Original message headers:
Return-Path: <user2@domain2.com>
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1455806943-0af5f72d08039a0001-o0dzhJ
Received: from mail.MISSPELLED.com ([x.x.x.x]) by spam.domain2.com
 with ESMTP id SQBWGHIQGA8dpCgR; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:49:03 -0600 (CST)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: user3@domain2.com
Received: from EXCHANGE2010.MISSPELLED.local ([IPv5 here]) by
 EXCHANGE2010.MISSPELLED.local ([IPv6 here]) with mapi id
 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:49:03 -0600
From: "FirstName LastName" <user3@domain2.com>
To: "FirstName2 LastName2" <user3@domain2.com>
CC: FirstName3 LastName3 <user4@domain2.com>
Subject: FW: Error
Thread-Topic: Error
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: FW: Error
Thread-Index: AQHRaPr43IwmvwgvOEOjz0h4NQMT8Z8wr5AggAE1RSA=
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:49:02 +0000
Message-ID: <01287B1FF7036042B7D46D7D6418AEE793D9FF@EXCHANGE2010.MISSPELLED.local>
References: <EmHm2000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000O2NQZR00WU1DuL7yQ6GCIqCmW9_hQw@sfdc.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: [x.x.x.x]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[x.x.x.x]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1455806943
X-Barracuda-URL: https://ip:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 16323
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at domain2.com
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.50
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.50 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO, BSF_SC0_SA_TO_FROM_ADDR_MATCH, HTML_MESSAGE
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version
        Rule breakdown below
         pts rule name              description
        ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
        0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO    Envelope rcpt doesn't match header
        0.00 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
        0.50 BSF_SC0_SA_TO_FROM_ADDR_MATCH Sender Address Matches Recipient

Open in new window

Watch Question
Technical Designer
This problem has been solved!
Unlock 1 Answer and 3 Comments.
See Answer
Why Experts Exchange?

Experts Exchange always has the answer, or at the least points me in the correct direction! It is like having another employee that is extremely experienced.

Jim Murphy
Programmer at Smart IT Solutions

When asked, what has been your best career decision?

Deciding to stick with EE.

Mohamed Asif
Technical Department Head

Being involved with EE helped me to grow personally and professionally.

Carl Webster
CTP, Sr Infrastructure Consultant
Ask ANY Question

Connect with Certified Experts to gain insight and support on specific technology challenges including:

  • Troubleshooting
  • Research
  • Professional Opinions
Did You Know?

We've partnered with two important charities to provide clean water and computer science education to those who need it most. READ MORE