Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Setting up OWA access rule in SonicWall

Posted on 2016-07-15
6
Medium Priority
?
409 Views
Last Modified: 2016-07-19
Hi Guys,

I have difficulty setting up an OWA access rule in SonicWall.

I have SonicWall WAN connection (192.168.1.4)
.. coming from an ADSL router translating internet traffic to 192.168.1.4 -> SonicWall

LAN connection on 10.0.0.240 / 24
Exchange server on 10.0.0.27 / 24

I can't get the access rule / NAT to work:

ACCESS RULE:
From:  WAN
To:  LAN
Source Port:  Any
Service:  Exchange 2013 (http & https)
Source:  Any
Destination:  WAN Interface IP

NAT RULE:
Original Source:  Firewall Subnets
Translated Source:  WAN interface IP
Original Destination:  WAN interface IP
Translated Destination:  Exchange Server (10.0.0.27)
Original Service:  Exchange 2013 (http & https)
Translated Service:  Original
Inboud Interface:  Any
Outbound Interface:  Any

I've tried other configurations as well, but still no joy.

The log monitor has also not been really helpful, perhaps I am using wrong log-filter?
0
Comment
Question by:Rupert Eghardt
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Adam Brown
ID: 41713750
You're basically double NATing from your explanation. Try to get your router running in Bridge mode, so the IP is directly applied at the Sonicwall. Otherwise, you'll also have to set the rule up in your ADSL router as well. (NAT Public IP to SonicWall WAN port IP in Router, NAT Sonicwall WAN Port IP to Exchange server in SonicWall config). You also will want to limit the ports in the NAT rule to ports 443 and 25, since those are the ones that Exchange needs on the Internet.
0
 
LVL 27

Expert Comment

by:Blue Street Tech
ID: 41713821
Hi Rupert,

It could be double NATing but we'd need to see more details. You could have issues with a 443 conflict. On the surface it isn't obvious but if you have remote management enabled (443 enabled on the WAN Interface) while opening 443 on the WAN > LAN side. I said it is not terribly obvious because you'd typically think to look for open inbound ports on the WAN > LAN Zone not actually realizing management services (ping, management, etc.) run on WAN > WAN. The way to remedy this is to go to System > Administration and change the port next to HTTPS Port: under Web Management Settings.

Let me know how it goes!
1
 

Author Comment

by:Rupert Eghardt
ID: 41714518
Thanks Guys,

The ADSL router is locked by the service provider and can't be edited.
However, traffic from the internet (via the DSL router) is arriving at the SonicWALL router.
I realised this, when the admin page of the SonicWALL was displayed initially.

I changed the SSL port under Web Management settings for the SonicWall, and the admin page is no longer displayed.

This tells me that the 443 traffic is reaching the SonicWall, but not being relayed through to the Exchange server on 10.0.0.27.

Are the access & NAT rules above correct?
0
WatchGuard Case Study: Museum of Flight

“With limited money and limited staffing, we didn’t have a lot of choices in terms of what we could do to bring efficiency. WatchGuard played a central part in changing that.” To provide strong, secure Wi-Fi access within the museum, Hunter chose to deploy WatchGuard’s AP120 APs.

 
LVL 27

Accepted Solution

by:
Blue Street Tech earned 2000 total points
ID: 41714739
I changed the SSL port under Web Management settings for the SonicWall, and the admin page is no longer displayed.
Perfect this has now unblocked your 443 conflict. From now on when you login, you need to type your Public IP with the new port number you assigned for management, for example https://1.1.1.1:4443. Make sense?

If that is your only NAT policy then no that will not work. You need three NAT Policies: 1) inbound, 2) outbound and 3) loopback policy. I'd remove that you have or both the Access Rule and the NAT policy that you have specifically set up and then go the Wizards link in the top right of the GUI and select Public Server and follow the prompts. That is the best more complete way to open up ports on your SonicWALL. And if the Wizard is not flexible enough for what you want to do...don't worry about it...you can always go back to the Access Rules or NAT policies it has setup and modify them.

Let me know if you have any questions!
1
 

Author Comment

by:Rupert Eghardt
ID: 41718969
Thank you Diverseit,

I've deleted the NAT policy and used the wizard to setup a new set of NAT policies for publishing the server.

The wizard only created 2 x NAT rules, and still did not work.
I logged a call with SonicWALL and we've added a 3rd rule with their assistance. OWA is working ;-)

I encountered a strange problem, possibly a bug in the firmware;
Upon adding NAT rules, "custom rules" option,
Upon moving a rule to position 1, the SonicWALL deletes the rule without a prompt.
I tried a couple of times, the same problem occurred.

I have another server to publish on a different range 192.168.2.x  (SonicWALL on 10.0.0.x)
I've setup a static route, and the SonicWALL can ping the server successfully.
Setting up the same 3 x NAT rules for this server, doesn't work.  

Any ideas?
0
 
LVL 27

Expert Comment

by:Blue Street Tech
ID: 41719034
Strange. The wizard should always add three rules inbound, outbound and loopback. Did you have the option not to select loopback?

You can leave the priority of the NAT Policies default. I'm not sure I understand the auto-delete NAT policy. What NAT policy are you trying to create that the wizard hasn't already?

Regarding the other server, I'd love to help but it is outside of the scope of this question. Please open a new question and I'll hop on that and answer it for you. Experts Exchange likes to keep a specific question/specific answer so that when users try to find issues they find the answers instead of offshoots, etc. I hope you understand. :)
0

Featured Post

 [eBook] Windows Nano Server

Download this FREE eBook and learn all you need to get started with Windows Nano Server, including deployment options, remote management
and troubleshooting tips and tricks

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Steps to fix error: “Couldn’t mount the database that you specified. Specified database: HU-DB; Error code: An Active Manager operation fail”
There can be many situations demanding the conversion of Outlook OST files to PST format and as such, there is no shortage of automated tools to perform this conversion. However, what makes Stellar OST to PST converter stand above the rest? Let us e…
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.
There's a multitude of different network monitoring solutions out there, and you're probably wondering what makes NetCrunch so special. It's completely agentless, but does let you create an agent, if you desire. It offers powerful scalability …
Suggested Courses

971 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question