Hyper-V for small business, SAS or SSD?

I had this question after viewing Some Hyper-V Hardware and Software Best Practices.

We are looking at a new server to replace our aging SBS2011 box. I'm going Hyper-V, but I really don't know if it's worth going to a cluster based on our budget and use. Maybe 1 live + 1 replica. The boxes we will probably buy have 8-10 hot plug. Does it make sense to go with 3 eSSDs (costs have really come down!) in Raid 5 for the host OS + DC/Exchange/LoB Apps (sql, WSUS, SEPM) VMs and put the LoB data on 5-7 10k-15k SAS? I know the newer RAID controllers support this.
Josiah RockeNetwork & CommunicationsAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
Lee W, MVPConnect With a Mentor Technology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
Philip has done a great job (indeed he's even reviewed my article for me (though I do want to incorporate a few minor adjustments he suggested), but I'd probably opt for a 6 disk RAID 10 (I don't like RAID 5).

And you might want to consider the things I talk about in my article:
https://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/27799/Virtual-or-Physical.html
(Most of the info you might find helpful will be AFTER the first 1/3 of the article).
0
 
Josiah RockeNetwork & CommunicationsAuthor Commented:
Lee, thanks! So I gather from your article that eSSD is acceptable? So RAID 10 is back in style? It was when I installed 5 years ago, then it wasn't (I recall Philip posting something on his blog back in '13?) and now it is again? huh....the world keeps spinning!

THanks!
0
 
David Johnson, CD, MVPConnect With a Mentor OwnerCommented:
Budget and # of iops required are the limiting factors.. the slowest SSD outperforms 15K SAS Spinning Rust by an order of 100 for # of iops.
0
Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

 
Lee W, MVPConnect With a Mentor Technology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
I don't trust RAID 5 and I don't think Philip does either - I think he'd lean toward RAID 6 if I remember his previous posts correctly - but nothing wrong with RAID 10 other than the 50% disk cost.
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
Just be very careful, stringing SSDs in a RAID combination without the correct controller, speeds will not what you expect and will be less than RAID 6 and RAID 10 using SAS disks.

RAID 5 is no longer acceptable for use in an Enterprise Environment.

Dell issued this statement many years ago.

https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/ydi6i/dell_raid_5_is_no_longer_recommended_for_any/
0
 
Josiah RockeNetwork & CommunicationsAuthor Commented:
Thanks for the helpful comments. I will post a bit more specific info on my use case later, but quickly:

The SSD vs SAS drives in question are all in the dell server configurator. They would be enterprise drives tuned to an enterprise controller in a vendor supported scenario. The cost difference between 10k 600GB and 400GB SSD is minimal given we are only dealing with 8-10 spindles, so I was thinking it makes more sense to go SSD. However, the SSD are technically SATA, not SAS.
0
 
Josiah RockeNetwork & CommunicationsAuthor Commented:
Thanks for the links. Good stuff. I will be posting another question regarding the full server build.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.