Hyper-V for small business, SAS or SSD?

I had this question after viewing Some Hyper-V Hardware and Software Best Practices.

We are looking at a new server to replace our aging SBS2011 box. I'm going Hyper-V, but I really don't know if it's worth going to a cluster based on our budget and use. Maybe 1 live + 1 replica. The boxes we will probably buy have 8-10 hot plug. Does it make sense to go with 3 eSSDs (costs have really come down!) in Raid 5 for the host OS + DC/Exchange/LoB Apps (sql, WSUS, SEPM) VMs and put the LoB data on 5-7 10k-15k SAS? I know the newer RAID controllers support this.
Who is Participating?
Lee W, MVPConnect With a Mentor Technology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
Philip has done a great job (indeed he's even reviewed my article for me (though I do want to incorporate a few minor adjustments he suggested), but I'd probably opt for a 6 disk RAID 10 (I don't like RAID 5).

And you might want to consider the things I talk about in my article:
(Most of the info you might find helpful will be AFTER the first 1/3 of the article).
jrockman13Author Commented:
Lee, thanks! So I gather from your article that eSSD is acceptable? So RAID 10 is back in style? It was when I installed 5 years ago, then it wasn't (I recall Philip posting something on his blog back in '13?) and now it is again? huh....the world keeps spinning!

David Johnson, CD, MVPConnect With a Mentor OwnerCommented:
Budget and # of iops required are the limiting factors.. the slowest SSD outperforms 15K SAS Spinning Rust by an order of 100 for # of iops.
Easily Design & Build Your Next Website

Squarespace’s all-in-one platform gives you everything you need to express yourself creatively online, whether it is with a domain, website, or online store. Get started with your free trial today, and when ready, take 10% off your first purchase with offer code 'EXPERTS'.

Lee W, MVPConnect With a Mentor Technology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
I don't trust RAID 5 and I don't think Philip does either - I think he'd lean toward RAID 6 if I remember his previous posts correctly - but nothing wrong with RAID 10 other than the 50% disk cost.
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
Just be very careful, stringing SSDs in a RAID combination without the correct controller, speeds will not what you expect and will be less than RAID 6 and RAID 10 using SAS disks.

RAID 5 is no longer acceptable for use in an Enterprise Environment.

Dell issued this statement many years ago.

jrockman13Author Commented:
Thanks for the helpful comments. I will post a bit more specific info on my use case later, but quickly:

The SSD vs SAS drives in question are all in the dell server configurator. They would be enterprise drives tuned to an enterprise controller in a vendor supported scenario. The cost difference between 10k 600GB and 400GB SSD is minimal given we are only dealing with 8-10 spindles, so I was thinking it makes more sense to go SSD. However, the SSD are technically SATA, not SAS.
jrockman13Author Commented:
Thanks for the links. Good stuff. I will be posting another question regarding the full server build.
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.