Oracle sql question

I have a basic query that joins 2 tables (Oracle 9i), it runs fine and all, but I'm trying to fish out duplicate records, and when I resort to having count (column) > 1 the query runs but doesn't return any records.

Is it the fact that I'm joining 2 tables and having count works online on single-table data source, or is there something else at play here.

Thx
Roberto Madro R.Programmer AnalystAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

slightwv (䄆 Netminder) Commented:
Shouldn't be the join itself.

Can you post the SQL?

The following example works for me:
drop table tab1 purge;
create table tab1(col1 number);

drop table tab2 purge;
create table tab2(col1 number);

insert into tab1 values(1);
insert into tab1 values(1);
insert into tab1 values(2);

insert into tab2 values(1);
insert into tab2 values(2);
commit;

select t1.col1, t2.col1 from tab1 t1 join tab2 t2 on t1.col1=t2.col1 group by t1.col1, t2.col1 having count(t1.col1) > 1;

Open in new window

awking00Information Technology SpecialistCommented:
We really need to see your basic query. It could be that the use of having count(column) might be the problem. Typically, you would have something along the lines of -
select a.id, a.colx, b.coly, count(*)  ==> instead count of a certain column
from a inner join b on a.id = b.id
group by a.id, a.colx, b.col
having count(*) > 1
Roberto Madro R.Programmer AnalystAuthor Commented:
I should've been more precise, I'm not using join per se, but rather selecting from two tables and in the where clause setting  table1.column1 = table2.column1 kind of approach, does that approach factor into the discussion?
Determine the Perfect Price for Your IT Services

Do you wonder if your IT business is truly profitable or if you should raise your prices? Learn how to calculate your overhead burden with our free interactive tool and use it to determine the right price for your IT services. Download your free eBook now!

slightwv (䄆 Netminder) Commented:
That is still a join.  It is the older syntax.

Updating my query above, still works for me.

select t1.col1, t2.col1 from tab1 t1, tab2 t2 where t1.col1=t2.col1 group by t1.col1, t2.col1 having count(t1.col1) > 1;

Open in new window

Roberto Madro R.Programmer AnalystAuthor Commented:
Maybe there's something I'm missing;

select 
dv.donor_id, 
dv.visit_datetime,
dv.unit_number,
dn.fullname,
dn.address_line1||' '||dn.address_line2||' , '||dn.city||' '||dn.state_cd||' '||dn.zip_cd5 Address, 
'(' ||dn.evening_phone_area ||')' ||' '|| dn.evening_phone_prefix ||' '||dn.evening_phone_number EvePhone,
dn.date_of_birth,
Substr (Months_Between (sysdate, dn.date_of_birth)/12,0,2) Age,
Lower (dn.email_address) Email,
dv.donation_type_cd,
dv.historical_blood_type
from
rptdba.donor_visit dv,
rptdba.donor dn
where 
dn.donor_id = dv.donor_id and
dv.donation_type_cd Like 'T1' and
dv.historical_blood_type like 'O-' and
dv.batch_date >= to_char(to_date('20120101','YYYYMMDD')) and dv.batch_date <= Sysdate and
dv.visit_status_cd Like 'DN' 
Group By
dv.donor_id,
dv.visit_datetime,
dv.unit_number,
dn.fullname,
dn.address_line1,
dn.address_line2,
dn.city,
dn.state_cd,
dn.zip_cd5, 
dn.evening_phone_area,
dn.evening_phone_prefix,
dn.evening_phone_number,
dn.date_of_birth,
dn.date_of_birth,
dn.email_address,
dv.donation_type_cd,
dv.historical_blood_type
Having count(dv.donor_id) > 1

Open in new window

slightwv (䄆 Netminder) Commented:
the count in having count isn't counting that column over the entire result set.

You can see that by adding the count to the select and removing the having.

If the count column is always 1 based on that group by, the having will never return data.
select 
dv.donor_id, 
dv.visit_datetime,
dv.unit_number,
dn.fullname,
dn.address_line1||' '||dn.address_line2||' , '||dn.city||' '||dn.state_cd||' '||dn.zip_cd5 Address, 
'(' ||dn.evening_phone_area ||')' ||' '|| dn.evening_phone_prefix ||' '||dn.evening_phone_number EvePhone,
dn.date_of_birth,
Substr (Months_Between (sysdate, dn.date_of_birth)/12,0,2) Age,
Lower (dn.email_address) Email,
dv.donation_type_cd,
dv.historical_blood_type,
count(dv.donor_id)
from
rptdba.donor_visit dv,
rptdba.donor dn
where 
dn.donor_id = dv.donor_id and
dv.donation_type_cd Like 'T1' and
dv.historical_blood_type like 'O-' and
dv.batch_date >= to_char(to_date('20120101','YYYYMMDD')) and dv.batch_date <= Sysdate and
dv.visit_status_cd Like 'DN' 
Group By
dv.donor_id,
dv.visit_datetime,
dv.unit_number,
dn.fullname,
dn.address_line1,
dn.address_line2,
dn.city,
dn.state_cd,
dn.zip_cd5, 
dn.evening_phone_area,
dn.evening_phone_prefix,
dn.evening_phone_number,
dn.date_of_birth,
dn.date_of_birth,
dn.email_address,
dv.donation_type_cd,
dv.historical_blood_type

Open in new window




See if this is what you are after(I shortened the columns and changed the table names for my test case:
select donor_id, unit_number, fullname from (
select 
	dv.donor_id, 
	dv.unit_number,
	dn.fullname,
	count(dv.donor_id) over(partition by dv.donor_id) visit_count
from
	mydonor_visit dv,
	mydonor dn
where 
	dn.donor_id = dv.donor_id
)
where visit_count>1
/

Open in new window

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Roberto Madro R.Programmer AnalystAuthor Commented:
slightvw, right on pro, many thanks, I'll adjust my code accordingly and go from there.
slightwv (䄆 Netminder) Commented:
Note that my count over just counts the total number of visits for a single donor id.  that likely isn't really what you are after but without sample data and expected results, it is the best I can guess from the SQL you posted.

You would want to partition by all the columns used for the 'duplicates'.

It will also return all the rows.  If you only want the true duplicate rows, you likely want ROW_NUMBER instead of COUNT.
Roberto Madro R.Programmer AnalystAuthor Commented:
Sorry, I didn't realize that this question was still open. many thanks slightwv.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Oracle Database

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.