Solved

Savrstlib Not Releasing After Job Completed on Source System

Posted on 2016-07-21
5
15 Views
Last Modified: 2016-09-05
We are currently trying to use the savrstlib command between our source and target iSeries systems.  The transfer happens successfully; however, on the source system we need to kill the job otherwise we cannot access the files on the target system.  Is there a reason why the job wouldn't end on the source system if it is actually successful considering we checked the data on the target system upon killing the job?

Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.

-Anthony
0
Comment
Question by:Anthony6890
  • 4
5 Comments
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Anthony6890
Comment Utility
Sorry, as an update we've been doing savrstobj and not savrstlib.
0
 
LVL 34

Assisted Solution

by:Gary Patterson
Gary Patterson earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
I can' think of any reason that SAVRSTOBJ should be holding locks on objects after the save portion of the task completes.  If I recall correctly, SAVRSTOBJ just:

  • Creates a temporary save file
  • Executes the SAVOBJ command to save the specified objects to the save file (any source object locks should be released once this step completes)
  • Transmits the save file to the target system
  • Restores the objects from the save file on the target system

Can you provide the following:

1) Specific SAVRSTOBJ command that you are executing, with all parameters

2) Job log from save job on source system

3) Job locks (from DSPJOB) from the save job on the source system.

4) Job log from restore job on target system

5) Job locks from the restore job on the target system

6) WRKOBJLCK command on one of the locked objects on the target system before the source job is terminated.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Anthony6890
Comment Utility
Hi Gary, thanks for getting back to me. Give me a day or so to get you all that information.

Thanks.

Anthony
0
 
LVL 1

Accepted Solution

by:
Anthony6890 earned 0 total points
Comment Utility
Gary, it looks like the reason why it wasn't ending correctly was because of an actual WAN connection issue.  We've had some very successful tests so far, so we are content with the results.  Thank you for your suggestions on this.

-Anthony
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:Anthony6890
Comment Utility
Our issue ended up being outside the scope of the actual commands and the 400 itself and was instead the physical connection between the two locations.
0

Featured Post

Find Ransomware Secrets With All-Source Analysis

Ransomware has become a major concern for organizations; its prevalence has grown due to past successes achieved by threat actors. While each ransomware variant is different, we’ve seen some common tactics and trends used among the authors of the malware.

Join & Write a Comment

Marketing can be an uncomfortable undertaking, especially if your material is technology based. Luckily, we’ve compiled some simple and (relatively) painless tips to put an end to your trepidation and start your path to success.
A procedure for exporting installed hotfix details of remote computers using powershell
It is a freely distributed piece of software for such tasks as photo retouching, image composition and image authoring. It works on many operating systems, in many languages.
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, fr…

743 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

16 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now