Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Savrstlib Not Releasing After Job Completed on Source System

Posted on 2016-07-21
5
Medium Priority
?
49 Views
Last Modified: 2016-09-05
We are currently trying to use the savrstlib command between our source and target iSeries systems.  The transfer happens successfully; however, on the source system we need to kill the job otherwise we cannot access the files on the target system.  Is there a reason why the job wouldn't end on the source system if it is actually successful considering we checked the data on the target system upon killing the job?

Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.

-Anthony
0
Comment
Question by:Anthony6890
  • 4
5 Comments
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Anthony6890
ID: 41723407
Sorry, as an update we've been doing savrstobj and not savrstlib.
0
 
LVL 35

Assisted Solution

by:Gary Patterson
Gary Patterson earned 2000 total points
ID: 41725316
I can' think of any reason that SAVRSTOBJ should be holding locks on objects after the save portion of the task completes.  If I recall correctly, SAVRSTOBJ just:

  • Creates a temporary save file
  • Executes the SAVOBJ command to save the specified objects to the save file (any source object locks should be released once this step completes)
  • Transmits the save file to the target system
  • Restores the objects from the save file on the target system

Can you provide the following:

1) Specific SAVRSTOBJ command that you are executing, with all parameters

2) Job log from save job on source system

3) Job locks (from DSPJOB) from the save job on the source system.

4) Job log from restore job on target system

5) Job locks from the restore job on the target system

6) WRKOBJLCK command on one of the locked objects on the target system before the source job is terminated.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Anthony6890
ID: 41725321
Hi Gary, thanks for getting back to me. Give me a day or so to get you all that information.

Thanks.

Anthony
0
 
LVL 1

Accepted Solution

by:
Anthony6890 earned 0 total points
ID: 41778573
Gary, it looks like the reason why it wasn't ending correctly was because of an actual WAN connection issue.  We've had some very successful tests so far, so we are content with the results.  Thank you for your suggestions on this.

-Anthony
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:Anthony6890
ID: 41784431
Our issue ended up being outside the scope of the actual commands and the 400 itself and was instead the physical connection between the two locations.
0

Featured Post

Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Microsoft Access has a limit of 255 columns in a single table; SQL Server allows tables with over 255 columns, but reading that data is not necessarily simple.  The final solution for this task involved creating a custom text parser and then reading…
Hello there! As a developer I have modified and refactored the unit tests which was written by fellow developers in the past. On the course, I have gone through various misconceptions and technical challenges when it comes to implementation. I would…
This lesson discusses how to use a Mainform + Subforms in Microsoft Access to find and enter data for payments on orders. The sample data comes from a custom shop that builds and sells movable storage structures that are delivered to your property. …
Screencast - Getting to Know the Pipeline
Suggested Courses

927 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question