RDS server and File Server question

hi, i have installed a virtual environment for a customer.

i installed;

2x AD Controllers (windows server 2012)
1x SQL Server ( SQL Web 2014)
2x RDS Server ( windows server 2012)
1x File Server (windows server 2012)

questions:

1. my customer has 35 users connecting to that RDS server for working in office and small sql database use. Do i need 2 RDS servers and use load balancing?

2. if i do load balancing then i use "user profile disks"? and where do i place this disks?
3. my customer needs a file server. i installed a regular windows server to use a file host. is this ok or do i best install some kind of nas? and what to use then?

thanks!
LVL 1
Rik Van LierCEOAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

robocatCommented:
1. it's hard to say how many RDS servers you need for any number of users. It all depends on the load these users generate and this may vary on the applications and usage patterns. But 2 (with load balancing) is probably better than one, even for only 35 users.

2. user profile disks live on a network share on your file server.

3. again, it all depends on how heavy duty the file server needs to be to satisfy the users. You don't specify which hardware you use for the virtual environment, but if the host server(s) has sufficient I/O resources, then a virtual file server can probably suffice.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Aaron TomoskySD-WAN SimplifiedCommented:
How many of those 35 users will be in rds at the same time? Full desktops or remote apps?
0
Rik Van LierCEOAuthor Commented:
there will be 35 users connected and full desktops.
0
The 7 Worst Nightmares of a Sysadmin

Fear not! To defend your business’ IT systems we’re going to shine a light on the seven most sinister terrors that haunt sysadmins. That way you can be sure there’s nothing in your stack waiting to go bump in the night.

Aaron TomoskySD-WAN SimplifiedCommented:
When will os updates, patching, app updates and installs happen? I generally prefer a gateway server and two session hosts just so I can move users to one, update and patch the other, then move users back. It also allows you to run one session host on different hardware if you do need more resources.
0
Philip ElderTechnical Architect - HA/Compute/StorageCommented:
Is this one Hyper-V or VMware host? If yes, then why two DC VMs?

Answers:
1: That depends on the apps running on the VM and the underlying hardware driving the VM (CPU, RAM, and hard disk). As a rule, we would deploy one Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) with all roles set up.

2: UPDs would go on a network Windows file server. You could set up two RDSH VMs dedicated to each subset of users (security group filtering) to eliminate the need to configure a farm (broker).

3: Set up a Windows Server VM with the File Services and Resource Management Roles and Features. It's our preference to only deliver files via a Windows based file server. Volume Shadow Copies is a key reason for recovering files/folders by the user, another is permission sets are simpler to manage, and we can have auditing if need-be.
0
Rik Van LierCEOAuthor Commented:
Philip Elder,

we setup 2 DC controller just to make sure. If one goes down then no user can logon unless its recovered. like this the users always can logon.

i have for each rds server 32GB ram, 8 vCPU @2.9Ghz and 4 1GB's lan's.

usage will be: internet, office, small sql usage on a accountancy program.
users will connect from 12 different locations in one country.
0
robocatCommented:
You should definitely have 2 DC.

What is the underlying hardware infrastructure? Hyper-V or VMWare?
0
Rik Van LierCEOAuthor Commented:
robocat, we are running on vmware esx 6
0
robocatCommented:
And what are the specs for the underlying hardware?
0
Rik Van LierCEOAuthor Commented:
i have for each rds server 32GB ram, 8 vCPU @2.9Ghz and 4 1GB's lan's.
RDS is running on 15k SAS hard drives
0
robocatCommented:
8 vCPU means that you're describing the virtual machine specs.  I'd like to know the specs of the underlying hardware.
0
Rik Van LierCEOAuthor Commented:
OK HP Server G7
Xeon X5560 2x 2.8Ghz
128GB RAM installed
8x SAS 15K 600GB P410 Controller
8x SSD 512GB P420 Controller
0
robocatCommented:
OK, based on that:

- do not allocate more than 4 vCPU for each RDS. More is not always beter and in this case it might even hurt performance.
- you should have plenty of IOPS from the disks, and a virtual fileserver should be just fine.

As things are virtual, you can always make changes to the setup after you get feedback from the users.

groetjes, robocat.
1
Rik Van LierCEOAuthor Commented:
Sorry for the waiting! had a few days holiday! installation is succesfull
0
Aaron TomoskySD-WAN SimplifiedCommented:
Good advice given
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Windows Server 2012

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.