Solved

Enterprise Hard Drives 512n, 512e or 4K sectoring

Posted on 2016-07-27
4
260 Views
Last Modified: 2016-07-28
What is the difference?
0
Comment
Question by:LockDown32
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 80

Accepted Solution

by:
David Johnson, CD, MVP earned 168 total points
ID: 41732441
512n is the older format 512K sectors
512e means a 512-byte sector size is being emulated but it is a 4KB sector size but any updates will require the drive reading the entire 4K sector changing the 512bytes then writing back the entire 4K sector instead of the O/S doing it if it was using a native 4096 byte sector size.

Windows Backup before Server 2012 is limited to 512n drives and will not work with advanced format 4K sectors.
0
 
LVL 15

Author Comment

by:LockDown32
ID: 41732943
So why all of a sudden the shift to new sector sizes. What do the new sector sizes bring to the party?
0
 
LVL 55

Assisted Solution

by:andyalder
andyalder earned 166 total points
ID: 41733006
You can get more data on the disks using Advanced Format because there's only one inter-sector gap every 4K bytes rather than every 512 bytes, see figure 1 at http://www.seagate.com/gb/en/tech-insights/advanced-format-4k-sector-hard-drives-master-ti/

Downside is if you have a lot of files that are 512 bytes long they'll take up 4K each on an 4K sectored drive (they would take 4K each anyway on NTFS default allocation unit size). David already mentioned the read/modify/write downside of 512e.
0
 
LVL 47

Assisted Solution

by:dlethe
dlethe earned 166 total points
ID: 41733020
The 4K sectored drives offer performance benefits as well, but some caveats
 - Low-end RAID controllers generally won't support 4K sectored drives
 - Not all versions of all operating systems will support 4K sectored drives
 - You can't combine 4K sectored disks with non-4K sectored disks in software or hardware RAID.

As for actually giving you an answer
 - AVOID 512e.   They do a read-modify-write when doing an I/O that isn't a whole number multiple of 4K.  This will cause significant performance issue, but can also lead to data corruption.

 - If your O/S and controllers support 4K, go down that path, because sooner or later, all disks will be 4K.

- 512n is the "safe" choice, if you don't specifically have support for 4K sectored, or are unsure take the 512n.
0

Featured Post

Edgartown IT Case Study

Learn about Edgartown's quest to ensure the safety and security of the entire town's employee and citizen data. Read the case study!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Swapping Out Hard Drive - System Reboots 8 68
SSD mSata 250GB 37 98
Veeam Replication vs. SRM for DR scenario ? 6 129
logical drive not on preferred path 3 47
This article is an update and follow-up of my previous article:   Storage 101: common concepts in the IT enterprise storage This time, I expand on more frequently used storage concepts.
We look at whether swapping a controller board on a failed hard drive is likely to solve the problem.
This video Micro Tutorial explains how to clone a hard drive using a commercial software product for Windows systems called Casper from Future Systems Solutions (FSS). Cloning makes an exact, complete copy of one hard disk drive (HDD) onto another d…
I've attached the XLSM Excel spreadsheet I used in the video and also text files containing the macros used below. https://filedb.experts-exchange.com/incoming/2017/03_w12/1151775/Permutations.txt https://filedb.experts-exchange.com/incoming/201…

740 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question