Having return statement within the loop will return the result before checking all the numbers.

This one is kinda hard to explain so try to understand the below code. Two variables are needed to track the absence of 1 and 4 separately. If only one variable is used we can change the variable to false if 1 is found. But it maybe the case that no 4's are present in which case it should return true.

public boolean no14(int[] nums) { boolean no1=true, no4=true; for(int i=0;i<nums.length;i++){ if(nums[i]==1) no1=false; // it contains 1's, so it contains no 1's is false else if(nums[i]==4) no4=false; // it contains 4's, so it contains no 4's is false } return no1||no4; // return true if it contains no 1's or it contains no 4's.}

even putting return outside fails tests. i wonder why?

Expected Run
no14([1, 2, 3]) → true true OK
no14([1, 2, 3, 4]) → false true X
no14([2, 3, 4]) → true true OK
no14([1, 1, 4, 4]) → false true X
no14([2, 2, 4, 4]) → true true OK
no14([2, 3, 4, 1]) → false true X
no14([2, 1, 1]) → true true OK
no14([1, 4]) → false true X
no14([2]) → true true OK
no14([2, 1]) → true true OK
no14([1]) → true true OK
no14([4]) → true true OK
no14([]) → true false X
no14([1, 1, 1, 1]) → true true OK
no14([9, 4, 4, 1]) → false true X
no14([4, 2, 3, 1]) → false true X
no14([4, 2, 3, 5]) → true true OK
no14([4, 4, 2]) → true true OK
no14([1, 4, 4]) → false true X
other tests
X

0

We have some fantastic news for our Android fans. We’re so excited to announce that the Linux Academy Android app is now available with Chromecast support. That’s right – simply download the latest update of the Linux Academy App and start casting your favorite course videos!

if(nums[i]==1) no1=false; // it contains 1's, so it contains no 1's is false else if(nums[i]==4) no4=false; // it contains 4's, so it contains no 4's is false }

if(nums[i]==1) no1=false; // it contains 1's, so it contains no 1's is false else if(nums[i]==4) no4=false; // it contains 4's, so it contains no 4's is false }

If you check the results you will see that the above return true for any given number.
But the below code uses two variables not one. Variable "no1" is true is no 1's are found. Variable "no4" is true if no 4's are found. And the code returns true if either variable is true. That is if either no 1's or no 4's were found.

if(nums[i]==1) no1=false; // it contains 1's, so it contains no 1's is false else if(nums[i]==4) no4=false; // it contains 4's, so it contains no 4's is false }

If you check the results you will see that the above return true for any given number.//i see that
But the below code uses two variables not one. Variable "no1" is true is no 1's are found. Variable "no4" is true if no 4's are found. //how to decide to take as two separate variables???

And the code returns true if either variable is true. That is if either no 1's or no 4's were found.//this is clear

//how to decide to take as two separate variables???

because the question asks you to return true if EITHER 1 or 4 is not found. So a test like 2,3,4 should return true, because there are no 1s in it. A test like 2,3,1 would return true because . . . well, you tell us.

So you need to keep track of their existence *separately*.

Let's say the numbers are 1,2,3,4. If we know a given number is present, but don't know the rest of the numbers, can we determine whether the statement "contains no 1's or contains no 4's" is true or false?

# "contains no 1's or contains no 4's" "contains no 1's" "contains no 4's"
1 Can't determine False Can't determine
2 Can't determine Can't determine Can't determine
3 Can't determine Can't determine Can't determine
4 Can't determine Can't determine False

1. If we only know 1 is present, we can't be sure whether the statement is true or false. But we can be sure that part of the statement that is "contains no 1's" is false. However, we can't be sure whether the other part of the statement that is "contains no 4's" is true or false.
2. If we only know 2 is present, we can't be sure whether the statement is true or false. And we can't be sure that any part of the statement is true or false either.
3. If we only know 3 is present, we can't be sure whether the statement is true or false. And we can't be sure that any part of the statement is true or false either.
4.If we only know 4 is present, we can't be sure whether the statement is true or false. But we can be sure that part of the statement that is "contains no 4's" is false. However, we can't be sure whether the other part of the statement that is "contains no 1's" is true or false.

Since by looking at any one given number we can't be sure whether the statement is true or false, we can't use a single variable to represent whether the statement is true or false. But since by looking at any one given number, and if the number is 1, we can be sure that the statement "contains no 1's" is false, we can use a variable to represent whether the statement "contains no 1's" is true or false. Likewise since by looking at any one given number, and if the number is 4, we can be sure that the statement "contains no 4's" is false, we can use a variable to represent whether the statement "contains no 4's" is true or false.

And as shown by krakatoa 1 variable could be technically used. But this variable can only represent that a part of the statement is true or false. And since if one part of an OR statement is true the whole statement must be true, we don't need to check the other part. But if the first part was false we would need to check whether the second part is true or false.

A single boolean variable cannot be used to represent whether the whole statement is true or false. But an integer variable could be used. But it would make things complex and hard to understand.

//how to decide to take as two separate variables???

because the question asks you to return true if EITHER 1 or 4 is not found. So a test like 2,3,4 should return true, because there are no 1s in it. A test like 2,3,1 would return true because . . . well, you tell us.

So you need to keep track of their existence *separately*.

//how to decide to take as two separate variables???

because the question asks you to return true if EITHER 1 or 4 is not found. So a test like 2,3,4 should return true, because there are no 1s in it. A test like 2,3,1 would return true because ...there are no 4s

So you need to keep track of their existence *separately*.

above is clear now.

0

Featured Post

PeopleSoft Adoption Made Smooth & Simple!

On-The-Job Training Is made Intuitive & Easy With WalkMe's On-Screen Guidance Tool. Claim Your Free WalkMe Account Now

Basic understanding on "OO- Object Orientation" is needed for designing a logical solution to solve a problem. Basic OOAD is a prerequisite for a coder to ensure that they follow the basic design of OO. This would help developers to understand the b…

What do responsible coders do? They don't take detrimental shortcuts. They do take reasonable security precautions, create important automation, implement sufficient logging, fix things they break, and care about users.

The viewer will learn how to use the return statement in functions in C++. The video will also teach the user how to pass data to a function and have the function return data back for further processing.

This video will show you how to get GIT to work in Eclipse.
It will walk you through how to install the EGit plugin in eclipse and how to checkout an existing repository.