[2 days left] What’s wrong with your cloud strategy? Learn why multicloud solutions matter with Nimble Storage.Register Now

x
?
Solved

Backup Software for SQL2012

Posted on 2016-08-11
7
Medium Priority
?
61 Views
Last Modified: 2016-08-16
Please recommend best backup software for SQL 2012 providing continous data protection
0
Comment
Question by:shamnad
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
7 Comments
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:Schnell Solutions
ID: 41752630
There are many options on the market. Most of the well known backup softwares includes the APIs and the support for working with SQL server.

From the Microsoft side, it exist for example 'System Center Data Protection Manager', which is compatible with most of the different SQL features (Cluster, Mirroring, Always-On, etc).
0
 
LVL 98

Expert Comment

by:John Hurst
ID: 41752636
We use Backup Exec for this purpose. We have found over time that nightly backup suffices and that tape provides for large backups economically
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Ivan
ID: 41752739
Hi,

we are using Veeam, backing up on every 15min, but it has a lot of options. Shifted from DPM to it, and it works great.

Regards,
Ivan.
0
Has Powershell sent you back into the Stone Age?

If managing Active Directory using Windows Powershell® is making you feel like you stepped back in time, you are not alone.  For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why.

 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:pgm554
ID: 41752826
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Mdlinnett
ID: 41752909
If your SQL Installation lives on a virtual machine, Veeam would be the way to go.

Can you define what you mean by 'continuous data protection'?  Do you mean to have access to your SQL environment 100% of the time, regardless of hardware failure?  That means thinking about redundancy / clustering rather than backups.

If you mean being able to backup the database files without taking it offline, consider creating a database maintenance plan that creates a flat file backup and truncates your transaction logs.
0
 
LVL 43

Accepted Solution

by:
Adam Brown earned 2000 total points
ID: 41752912
Continuous Data Protection is the difficult (and potentially expensive) piece you're asking for. Veeam's solutions tout "Near-Continuous Data Protection" which means you can have it constantly running backup jobs on systems, but it is still a job-based solution. If your requirements are to provide to the second recovery, that won't suffice. If you have a little leeway, it will work well enough. Backup Exec doesn't do anything near Continuous Data Protection, so it won't meet your needs.

You would be looking at solutions from Commvault, IBMs Tivoli, or similar solutions. There's also a company called Datto that has a NAS-based enterprise solution that is capable of doing copy-on-write backups which will probably meet your needs as well. Of these, I don't think it's wise for me to say which one is "best" because it depends heavily on all of your needs. You've only said you need SQL 2012 backups with Continuous Data Protection. You probably have a lot more needs you haven't considered, and discovering those is pretty far outside the scope of what we can do here in a single question.

If the only thing you need continuous data protection for is a single SQL 2012 server, you would be best served by utilizing SQL 2012's Always on Availability Groups, which are similar to Exchange DAGs. Essentially, you would have two or more SQL servers mirrored with one another (without the requirement of Clustered data storage). One of these mirrors should be configured as a "lagged" database, which would allow you to have a copy of the database that is up to 2 weeks behind the others with log files that can bring it up to date. The lagged copy would allow you to recover from database corruption issues. Using that technique with a traditional backup model would allow you to have high-availability without having to invest in an enterprise CDP solution. I haven't done a cost-comparison of SQL Always On vs CDP, but I imagine it's significantly cheaper to have two SQL servers than a fully CDP capable backup solution.
0
 
LVL 52

Expert Comment

by:Vitor Montalvão
ID: 41753804
Don't you like the native SQL Server backup solution?
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A Stored Procedure in Microsoft SQL Server is a powerful feature that it can be used to execute the Data Manipulation Language (DML) or Data Definition Language (DDL). Depending on business requirements, a single Stored Procedure can return differe…
Recently we ran in to an issue while running some SQL jobs where we were trying to process the cubes.  We got an error saying failure stating 'NT SERVICE\SQLSERVERAGENT does not have access to Analysis Services. So this is a way to automate that wit…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of configuring their Windows Server 2012 domain controller to synchronize its time with a trusted, external resource. Use Google, Bing, or other preferred search engine to locate trusted NTP …
Viewers will learn how to use the SELECT statement in SQL and will be exposed to the many uses the SELECT statement has.

656 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question