Alternatives to Access Split Form

I am creating a access database in which I want the main form to be a split form.  Is there a way to emulate the split form functionality without actually creating a split form?
I want to get away from actually using a "split form" because of the limitations of having a set datasource.   I feel that if I am using a split form with a set datasource eventually I will hit a wall with my dbase logic as it is developed.
tike55Asked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

DatabaseMX (Joe Anderson - Microsoft Access MVP)Database Architect / Systems AnalystCommented:
Sure .... just use a Sub Form instead.  Sub Form on a Main Form.
You have MUCH more control that way.
1
PatHartmanCommented:
I've done this two ways.  One method uses the single record as the main form with a subform for the "list".  The other method uses an unbound main form and two bound subforms.  One for the single record and one for the "list".  I have a preference for the second method because I prefer the list to be more prominent and I can accomplish that more easily by using two subforms on an unbound main form.

The recordSource for the single subform is a query that references the list subform for criteria.

Where MyID = Forms!mainform!sfrmList!MyID

Then in the current event of the list subform, you requery the single view subform.

Forms!mainform.Form.sfrmSingle.Requery
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Rey Obrero (Capricorn1)Commented:
0
PatHartmanCommented:
The concept of the article Rey pointed to is the typical 1-many format where the 1-side controls what shows in the many-side.  You are doing this backwards so you cannot use master-child links to control the syncing of the two forms.  You have to control it some other way.  I use queries with criteria that references the list type subform.
0
Helen FeddemaCommented:
I wrote an Access Archon on this topic a while back ("Fake Split Form" for older Access versions).  Here is a link to the article (with sample database):

http://www.helenfeddema.com/Files/accarch192.zip
and here is a screen shot of the form:
Fake split form
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft Access

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.