Solved

maxMirror challenge

Posted on 2016-08-14
10
189 Views
Last Modified: 2016-08-23
Hi,

I am working on below challenge

http://codingbat.com/prob/p196409

Array-3 > maxMirror
prev  |  next  |  chance
We'll say that a "mirror" section in an array is a group of contiguous elements such that somewhere in the array, the same group appears in reverse order. For example, the largest mirror section in {1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 3, 2, 1} is length 3 (the {1, 2, 3} part). Return the size of the largest mirror section found in the given array.

maxMirror([1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 3, 2, 1]) → 3
maxMirror([1, 2, 1, 4]) → 3
maxMirror([7, 1, 2, 9, 7, 2, 1]) → 2

i have not completely understood the description.

How below is 3

maxMirror([1, 2, 1, 4]) → 3
0
Comment
Question by:gudii9
  • 5
  • 3
  • 2
10 Comments
 
LVL 38

Expert Comment

by:Gerwin Jansen, EE MVE
ID: 41756129
1 2 1 is a 'mirror' that is 3 characters long
0
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:gudii9
ID: 41756461
maxMirror([1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 3, 2, 1]) → 3//1,2,3  has mirror image of 3,2,1 with respect to mirror 8,9

maxMirror([7, 1, 2, 9, 7, 2, 1]) → 2// 1,2 has mirror image of 2,1 with respect to mirror 9.7

maxMirror([1, 2, 1, 4]) → 1,2,1 is base image right where is the mirror image and with respect to what mirror?
0
 
LVL 38

Assisted Solution

by:Gerwin Jansen, EE MVE
Gerwin Jansen, EE MVE earned 250 total points
ID: 41756551
Last one has no real mirror. Real description carefully. 121 and 121 are the same from left to right and from right to left.... So length is 3
0
How our DevOps Teams Maximize Uptime

Our Dev teams are like yours. They’re continually cranking out code for new features/bugs fixes, testing, deploying, responding to production monitoring events and more. It’s complex. So, we thought you’d like to see what’s working for us. Read the use case whitepaper.

 
LVL 27

Accepted Solution

by:
d-glitch earned 250 total points
ID: 41756552
The center can be outside of the sequence, or inside.
Write the array forward and reverse, and look for the longest common sequence.

FWD = [7, 1, 2, 9, 7, 2, 1]         REV = [1, 2, 7, 9, 2, 1, 7]
Note that there are actually two sequences of length 2.

FWD = [1, 2, 1, 4]                      REV = [4, 1, 2, 1]
Here there is one sequence of length 3.
0
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:gudii9
ID: 41760201
not able to get idea on approach to this challenge?
0
 
LVL 38

Expert Comment

by:Gerwin Jansen, EE MVE
ID: 41760784
Pseudo code! Write down what you would do to recognise a 'mirror'.

Look at the first example, I would start at the beginning, I find a 1, then also start and the end and walk back to be begin, see if I can find another 1. If not or if it's the same, then it's no mirror. If there is another 1, then at the beginning, increase one step and repeat from the end where you've found the other 1.
0
 
LVL 27

Expert Comment

by:d-glitch
ID: 41760851
You could also turn this into pseudo code:
Write the array forward and reverse, and look for the longest common sequence.
It doesn't say so it in the challenge, but every element in an array will be a mirror sequence of length 1.
0
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:gudii9
ID: 41767106
It doesn't say so it in the challenge, but every element in an array will be a mirror sequence of length 1.
i was not clear on above. can you please elaborate on it? How every element in array is mirror sequence of length 1?
0
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:gudii9
ID: 41767191
public int maxMirror(int[] nums) {

		int len = nums.length;
		int total = 0;
		int highest = 0;
		for (int x = 0; x < len; x++) {
			total = 0;
			for (int j = len - 1; x + total < len && j > -1; j--) {
				if (nums[x + total] == nums[j]) {
					total++;
				} else {
					if (total > 0) {
						highest = Math.max(total, highest);
						total = 0;
					}
				}
			}
			highest = Math.max(total, highest);
		}
		return highest;
}

Open in new window


above passed all tests
Expected      Run            
maxMirror([1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 3, 2, 1]) → 3      3      OK      
maxMirror([1, 2, 1, 4]) → 3      3      OK      
maxMirror([7, 1, 2, 9, 7, 2, 1]) → 2      2      OK      
maxMirror([21, 22, 9, 8, 7, 6, 23, 24, 6, 7, 8, 9, 25, 7, 8, 9]) → 4      4      OK      
maxMirror([1, 2, 1, 20, 21, 1, 2, 1, 2, 23, 24, 2, 1, 2, 1, 25]) → 4      4      OK      
maxMirror([1, 2, 3, 2, 1]) → 5      5      OK      
maxMirror([1, 2, 3, 3, 8]) → 2      2      OK      
maxMirror([1, 2, 7, 8, 1, 7, 2]) → 2      2      OK      
maxMirror([1, 1, 1]) → 3      3      OK      
maxMirror([1]) → 1      1      OK      
maxMirror([]) → 0      0      OK      
maxMirror([9, 1, 1, 4, 2, 1, 1, 1]) → 3      3      OK      
maxMirror([5, 9, 9, 4, 5, 4, 9, 9, 2]) → 7      7      OK      
maxMirror([5, 9, 9, 6, 5, 4, 9, 9, 2]) → 2      2      OK      
maxMirror([5, 9, 1, 6, 5, 4, 1, 9, 5]) → 3      3      OK      
other tests
OK      

for every i in forward direction checking every j in reverse. if equal increasing the total variable the highests

package com.solution;

public class MaxMirror {

	public static void main(String[] args) {
		// TODO Auto-generated method stub
		int[] ar = { 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 3, 2, 1 };
		int[] ar1 = { 1, 2, 1, 4};
		//System.out.println("value===>" + maxMirror(ar));
		System.out.println("value===>" + maxMirror(ar1));
	}

	public static int maxMirror(int[] nums) {
		int len = nums.length;
		int total = 0;
		int highest = 0;
		for (int x = 0; x < len; x++) {
			total = 0;
			for (int j = len - 1; x + total < len && j > -1; j--) {
				if (nums[x + total] == nums[j]) {
					total++;
				} else {
					if (total > 0) {
						highest = Math.max(total, highest);
						total = 0;
					}
				}
			}
			highest = Math.max(total, highest);
		}
		return highest;
	}

}

Open in new window


value===>3




i       j     highest
0     3      

0     2      

0     1      
0     0   3

1    3    

1     2      

1     1      

1     0       3



2    3    

2     2      

2     1      

2     0       3





3   3    

3     2      

3     1      

3     0       3
0
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:gudii9
ID: 41767195
any improvements or alternate approaches?
0

Featured Post

Webinar: Aligning, Automating, Winning

Join Dan Russo, Senior Manager of Operations Intelligence, for an in-depth discussion on how Dealertrack, leading provider of integrated digital solutions for the automotive industry, transformed their DevOps processes to increase collaboration and move with greater velocity.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

If you’re thinking to yourself “That description sounds a lot like two people doing the work that one could accomplish,” you’re not alone.
In this post we will learn different types of Android Layout and some basics of an Android App.
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

740 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question