The KE6900 series can extend and deploy computers with high definition displays across multiple stations in a variety of applications that suit any environment. Expand computer use to stations across multiple rooms with dynamic access.
Course Of The Month
2 days, 23 hours left to enrollBecome a Premium Member and unlock a new, free course in leading technologies each month.
Solved
Internet Explorer wont recognise uppercase file extensions (Tomcat application)
Posted on 2016-08-18
I have a Ubuntu server running apache webserver and Tomcat; also Win7 client + IE11, FF, Chrome:
I understand that, as Ubuntu (Linux) differs upper from lowercase, it does make a diffence from default.jpg to default.JPG ..
Now in our Tomcat application thumbnails of *.JPG do not show up, but only in Internet Explorer (11).
Chrome and Firefox seem to not care very much - no problems.
So I guess I have to add the uppercase MIME types to the web.xml - but I would like to know, why/how IE handles MIME Types differently to other browsers?
Of couse, it is strongly entagled with Windows OS which itself also does not differ upper and lowercase.. So is the root cause of this, how the mime types are defined (in the registry?) and processed by different browsers (Chrome/FF handling MIME types on their own)?
Can somebody confirm this and/or give a more detailed reason?
I understand that, as Ubuntu (Linux) differs upper from lowercase, it does make a diffence from default.jpg to default.JPG ..
Now in our Tomcat application thumbnails of *.JPG do not show up, but only in Internet Explorer (11).
Chrome and Firefox seem to not care very much - no problems.
So I guess I have to add the uppercase MIME types to the web.xml - but I would like to know, why/how IE handles MIME Types differently to other browsers?
Of couse, it is strongly entagled with Windows OS which itself also does not differ upper and lowercase.. So is the root cause of this, how the mime types are defined (in the registry?) and processed by different browsers (Chrome/FF handling MIME types on their own)?
Can somebody confirm this and/or give a more detailed reason?
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange
Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.
- Help others & share knowledge
- Earn cash & points
- Learn & ask questions
-
4
3
7 Comments
Active today
That is very odd. I have never had that happen. The web server is the thing that recognizes the file names, the browser just sends them in the request. I don't think there are 'uppercase MIME' types. Can you give some sample files links that are loaded differently by IE and the other browsers?
Thanks for you comment.
Well, as Linux machines (= our webb/app server) are case sensitive. So are the MIME types:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9575756/servlet-for-file-upload-contenttype-returning-none-when-file-extension-in-ca
---
I can give more than an example, this is the network traffic logged by IE, see attachment.
---
So to fix this I would need to define uppercase MIME types in my tomcat web.xml.
But I would like to know, why IE handles this differently from Chrome/FF.
If I was very mean I would say: "Once again IE seems more stupid than any other browser"..
2016-08-19-09_43_19-Clipboard-johnen.jpg
Well, as Linux machines (= our webb/app server) are case sensitive. So are the MIME types:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9575756/servlet-for-file-upload-contenttype-returning-none-when-file-extension-in-ca
---
I can give more than an example, this is the network traffic logged by IE, see attachment.
---
So to fix this I would need to define uppercase MIME types in my tomcat web.xml.
But I would like to know, why IE handles this differently from Chrome/FF.
If I was very mean I would say: "Once again IE seems more stupid than any other browser"..
2016-08-19-09_43_19-Clipboard-johnen.jpg
Active today
Several things. You are having a problem with file extensions, not MIME types. They are not the same. Here is the 'official' list of MIME types: https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml
If the 'mime-mapping' works for you, use it. But that is an artifact of Tomcat and/or JAVA.
There is no reason for IE and Firefox to be acting differently that I know of. On my Linux Apache sites, they don't act differently. Maybe if you capture the headers from both you will see a difference.
If the 'mime-mapping' works for you, use it. But that is an artifact of Tomcat and/or JAVA.
<mime-mapping>
<extension>JPG</extension>
<mime-type>image/jpeg</mime-type>
</mime-mapping>
There is no reason for IE and Firefox to be acting differently that I know of. On my Linux Apache sites, they don't act differently. Maybe if you capture the headers from both you will see a difference.
That's hair-splitting now :)
Case-sensitve handling of file extensions causing running into indefined MIME types..
--
I noticed another thing, which might make a difference - you couldn't see on the first screenshot:
The image URL is like:
.../default.jpg?version=14
resp.
.../default.jpg?version=14
--
Maybe Chrome and FF interpret the MIME type from "default.jpg" => ignoring the paramters and following extensions;
While IE takes "the last file extension it gets" => causing the difference of upper and lowercase...(?)
Case-sensitve handling of file extensions causing running into indefined MIME types..
--
I noticed another thing, which might make a difference - you couldn't see on the first screenshot:
The image URL is like:
.../default.jpg?version=14
resp.
.../default.jpg?version=14
--
Maybe Chrome and FF interpret the MIME type from "default.jpg" => ignoring the paramters and following extensions;
While IE takes "the last file extension it gets" => causing the difference of upper and lowercase...(?)
Active today
All that is possible. I think the difference is Tomcat and whatever goes on there. I don't have any experience with Tomcat. My experience with hundreds of pages on Linux and Apache have never shown IE to have this problem. But I also have never used URLs like that. The only time I see URLs like that are when the first file name is actually a program and not an image.
Featured Post
You’ve already invested in ITSM tools, chat applications, automation utilities, and more. Fortify these solutions with intelligent communications so you can drive business processes forward.
With xMatters, you'll never miss a beat.
Question has a verified solution.
If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question
Determining the an SCCM package name from the Package ID
Ever visit a website where you spotted a really cool looking Font, yet couldn't figure out which font family it belonged to, or how to get a copy of it for your own use? This article explains the process of doing exactly that, as well as showing how…
- Microsoft Applications
- Windows OS
- Fonts Typography
- Web Browsers
- Microsoft Word
Any person in technology especially those working for big companies should at least know about the basics of web accessibility. Believe it or not there are even laws in place that require businesses to provide such means for the disabled and aging p…
This lesson goes over how to construct ordered and unordered lists and how to create hyperlinks.
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month2 days, 23 hours left to enroll
696 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.
Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.