Having Returning Anonymous Function Access Global Function

I have no idea how to get an anonymous function that returns a value to source a global function? If I have a normal anonymous function, everything works fine. If the anonymous function returns, then it doesn't work? Is there any way to get this to work? Example:
/ /global function
function _myGlobalFunct(str){
return (str);
}

Open in new window

the following anonymous function calls global function and it works as expected:
// working anonymous function
 (function () {
 window._myGlobalFunct("value1");
 })()

Open in new window

but the following return anonymous function doesn't call my function but doesn't throw any errors? :
// Not Working Properly but doesn't throw any errors?
return (function() { 
  var rvalue = document.title || "No Title";
 window._myGlobalFunct(rvalue);
return rvalue;
})();

Open in new window

894359Asked:
Who is Participating?
 
Slick812Commented:
OK, so it is part of a larger javascript Object structure, the Adobe DTM I guess, but I can not see or know the "Scope" of method variable inclusion, in an organization I do not know. If the "result" is not causing the problem, then my only guess is that the inclusion "Scope" does now include the -
      window._myGlobalFunct( )

but that does not seem posible to me? ? since you stated that the first code you had -
// working anonymous function
(function () {
window._myGlobalFunct("value1");
})()

worked?
So maybe someone else can help? ?
0
 
Albert Van HalenAnalyst developerCommented:
Use a function expression instead of function declaration.
So your code will look like this
_myGlobalFunct = function(str) {}

Open in new window

See : https://javascriptweblog.wordpress.com/2010/07/06/function-declarations-vs-function-expressions/
0
 
Slick812Commented:
greetings 894359, , I looked at what you call an "anonymous function" as -

return (function() {
  var rvalue = document.title || "No Title";
 window._myGlobalFunct(rvalue);
return rvalue;
})();


To me, the problem is when you placed the "return" as the FIRST operation in that progression, I can not see as there is Anything to return "TO", so I can not understand Why you even placed the "return" there at the beginning? ? and you have your "anonymous function" returning a String, Why? ? if you do not use that string on the return, why have a string return?

I have tried this in firefox and it works -
var r = "";

r = (function() { 
  var rvalue = document.title || "No Title";
 _myGlobalFunct(rvalue+"!!");
return rvalue+"!!";
})();

document.title = r;

Open in new window


Please notice that I have a return variable as -
      r =
for the function, so it can use the result of the text change,
ALSO I have NOT used the     window.      in-
       window._myGlobalFunct(rvalue);

and have it as a more practical -
       _myGlobalFunct(rvalue+"!!");
whay place a     window.     if it's not needed ?

One last observation, I do not see as using this "anonymous function" is any coding or functional advantage, so why use it?
couldn't you just use -
var rvalue = (document.title || "No Title")+"!!";
 _myGlobalFunct(rvalue);
document.title = rvalue

Open in new window

0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

 
894359Author Commented:
Just a little clarification, these are NOT the exact functions I'm using,  so don't focus on the functionality, only getting the global function to be called within the anonymous function. I just used these for clarification and to simplify the issue. In actuality , I'm trying to use a helper function in Adobe DTM. The Anonymous function is actually a bigger function that runs as a data element.
0
 
Slick812Commented:
OK, but most any javascript will not run after a -
   return

as the first element of the syntax unless there is a "container" to exit the code flow an "return"  to the code flow "out of" the container (method or function), so just have the function called as you first have it with out the "return" element, , as -

(function () {
0
 
894359Author Commented:
Hi Slick, the code does get encapsulated by other JS code.

0
 
894359Author Commented:
I had a syntax error on my side. This works as designed.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.