Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Cisco L3/L2  and Etherchannel Routing Not Working.

Posted on 2016-08-29
17
Medium Priority
?
73 Views
Last Modified: 2016-08-31
Hello Experts,

Can someone please take a look at my configurations and let me know why I'm not able to ping 200.1.1.2 from ALSW-9 and I'm not able to ping 100.1.1.2 from ALSW-10.?

This is despite that the etherchannels are up and running,

Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
1      Po1(RU)         LACP      Et0/0(P)    Et0/1(P)    

Also routing to the ip addresses is in both tables for DLSW-4 and DLSW-5

      200.1.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D        200.1.1.0 [90/130816] via 172.16.1.2, 01:24:55, Port-channel1
DLSW-4#

      100.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D        100.1.1.0 [90/130816] via 172.16.1.1, 01:25:49, Port-channel1
DLSW-5#

And there full eigrp neighbor relationship between DLSW-4 and DLSW-5


DLSW-4#show ip eigrp neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 Neighbors for AS(100)
H   Address                 Interface              Hold Uptime   SRTT   RTO  Q  Seq
                                                   (sec)         (ms)       Cnt Num
0   172.16.1.2              Po1                      11 00:06:18    4   100  0  5


DLSW-5#show ip eigrp neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 Neighbors for AS(100)
H   Address                 Interface              Hold Uptime   SRTT   RTO  Q  Seq
                                                   (sec)         (ms)       Cnt Num
0   172.16.1.1              Po1                      12 00:06:59    1   100  0  5

I have attached the configuration and topology




You're help will be much appreciated.

Regards
12-38-39--ALSW-10-64.187.124.3-.txt
12-38-50--ALSW-9-64.187.124.3-.txt
12-38-55--DLSW-4-64.187.124.3-.txt
12-39-02--DLSW-5-64.187.124.3-.txt
CCNP-Lab-004-Solution_-MLS-Image.jpg
0
Comment
Question by:Member_2_7966113
  • 9
  • 7
17 Comments
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Predrag
ID: 41775056
Switches ALSW-9 & ALSW-10
You are using routing, not switching on those devices.
Routing table does not have entry for destination network and packets are dropped.
Issue # show ip route routing table will show only connected networks in routing table on those devices.
You have two choices:
- create routes (static or dynamic) on those devices (default route should be enough)
- disable routing
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41775110
Hi Predrag,

Thanks for responding.

The routing tables do have routes to the networks

 200.1.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D        200.1.1.0 [90/130816] via 172.16.1.2, 01:24:55, Port-channel1

DLSW-4#

      100.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D        100.1.1.0 [90/130816] via 172.16.1.1, 01:25:49, Port-channel1

I want to ping 200.1.1.2 from DLSW-4 or ALSW-9 and the route exists on DLSW-4, but I can't ping the address.

In any case, I created dynamic routes with OSPF, see below and still unable to ping.

DLSW-4#show ip route ospf
Gateway of last resort is not set

      200.1.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O        200.1.1.0 [110/6] via 172.16.1.2, 05:29:40, Port-channel1
DLSW-4#


DLSW-4#show ip route

Gateway of last resort is not set

      100.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C        100.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, Vlan100
L        100.1.1.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan100
      172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C        172.16.1.0/30 is directly connected, Port-channel1
L        172.16.1.1/32 is directly connected, Port-channel1
      200.1.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O        200.1.1.0 [110/6] via 172.16.1.2, 05:30:19, Port-channel1



Also, are you suggesting the problem maybe with the command 'ip route'?

Cheers
0
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Predrag
ID: 41775118
Wrong switches.
You do not have routes on ALSW-9 & ALSW-10.
That is my point. Packets are dropped on source switches (they never reach ALSW-4 or ALSW-5).

My assumption is that ip routing is running on all switches.
If routing is not running you would not be able to run EIGRP on ALSW-4 & ALSW-5, but since routing is not visible in running config on -4 ad -5 I guess it is like that on every device (running but there is no ip routing in output from show command).
0
Identify and Prevent Potential Cyber-threats

Become the white hat who helps safeguard our interconnected world. Transform your career future by earning your MS in Cybersecurity. WGU’s MSCSIA degree program was designed in collaboration with national intelligence organizations and IT industry leaders.

 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Predrag
ID: 41775132
If routing is used there MUST be matching route for packets, otherwise packet is dropped. That's why you need at least default route on ALSW-9 & ALSW-10 (or to issue no ip routing on those switches (default gateway will be used in that case)).
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41775140
Thanks again Predrag,

I do have default route on ALSW-9 & ALSW-10. Did you check out the configs I uploaded?

I will see if issuing the no ip routing has an effect
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41775145
Predrag,

Just so you I can ping 200.1.1.2 from vlan 200 on DLSW-5, but I can't ping the address from it's port-channel with address 172.16.1.2
0
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Predrag
ID: 41775148
You do not have default route, just default gateway, and commands must be issued on both devices.
ALSW-10
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 200.1.1.1
ALSW-9
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 100.1.1.1
Or no ip routing on both devices.

Any device without route will drop packets, routing must be end to end!
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41775173
OK.

So I have removed ip routing from both ALSW-10 & ALSW-9. And when I try to ping 200.1.1.2 from ALSW-9 I now get:
ALSW-9#ping 200.1.1.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 200.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
U.U.U


Just so I'm clear.

Are you suggesting that I remove default gateway and instead put in ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 200.1.1.1 on ALSW-10?

If yes, won't I need to put back ip routing?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41775176
Predrag,

Still getting the same results with default route

ALSW-9#ping
*Aug 29 12:13:20.249: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
ALSW-9#ping 200.1.1.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 200.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
U.U.U
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

ALSW-9#show ip route
Gateway of last resort is 100.1.1.1 to network 0.0.0.0

S*    0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 100.1.1.1
      100.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C        100.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, Vlan100
L        100.1.1.2/32 is directly connected, Vlan100
ALSW-9#
0
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Predrag
ID: 41775217
U.U.U typically means - no route to destination or ICMP ping is blocked

try:
debug icmp
 on both devices it will give you the clue
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41775342
Hi Predrag,

I will have to revisit this tomorrow - my missus is getting annoyed with me.

I hope you're around tomorrow.

Cheers
0
 
LVL 31

Accepted Solution

by:
Predrag earned 2000 total points
ID: 41775361
I created the same scenario, but without etherchannel, everything works as it should with configuration details that I suggested. Etherchannel should not make any difference.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41778090
I also re-created the scenario without etherchannel with your suggestions and it worked.

Thank you.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41778093
I accidentally assigned myself the points.
0
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Predrag
ID: 41778129
In that case - I object, and assigning of points can be corrected.
:)
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:Member_2_7966113
ID: 41778202
Hi Predrag, thanks for your help. Your suggestions solved the problem. Cheers
0

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

When speed and performance are vital to revenue, companies must have complete confidence in their cloud environment.
There’s a movement in Information Technology (IT), and while it’s hard to define, it is gaining momentum. Some call it “stream-lined IT;” others call it “thin-model IT.”
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Both in life and business – not all partnerships are created equal. As the demand for cloud services increases, so do the number of self-proclaimed cloud partners. Asking the right questions up front in the partnership, will enable both parties …

886 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question