swgit
asked on
Network Performance & Cisco Catalyst 2960 (10/100)
Dear Experts,
I have an office of 18 users in a single AD domain with 2008 R2 File, Exchange 2010 and SharePoint 2010 servers... our LAN is on four 10/100 Cisco switches daisy chained together currently. How could I set these switches up so that the users could get the most network performance... and how do I measure or create the benchmark to see how the current setup is doing now... Please advise. Thanks.
I have an office of 18 users in a single AD domain with 2008 R2 File, Exchange 2010 and SharePoint 2010 servers... our LAN is on four 10/100 Cisco switches daisy chained together currently. How could I set these switches up so that the users could get the most network performance... and how do I measure or create the benchmark to see how the current setup is doing now... Please advise. Thanks.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Yeah, you COULD use etherchannel. (The limit is actually 8 channels, not 4, but 4 would probably suffice).
In your scenario, you would need to have 4 etherchannel compatible, 100Mb NICs in each server, and would consume an extra 18 ports on the switches.
Were it me, I would be spending a few $$s on GBIC 1000baseT adaptors. Not expensive, and way faster and less complex than configuring etherchannel.
In your scenario, you would need to have 4 etherchannel compatible, 100Mb NICs in each server, and would consume an extra 18 ports on the switches.
Were it me, I would be spending a few $$s on GBIC 1000baseT adaptors. Not expensive, and way faster and less complex than configuring etherchannel.
ASKER
Thanks both!!
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Genuine-Cisco-WS-G5482-1000BASE-T-GBIC-tested-/301705510670?hash=item463f0cbf0e:g:zQ8AAOSwHnFVwg3t