Solved

Network Performance & Cisco Catalyst 2960 (10/100)

Posted on 2016-09-06
5
67 Views
Last Modified: 2016-09-12
Dear Experts,

I have an office of 18 users in a single AD domain with 2008 R2 File, Exchange 2010 and SharePoint 2010 servers... our LAN is on four 10/100 Cisco switches daisy chained together currently.  How could I set these switches up so that the users could get the most network performance... and how do I measure or create the benchmark to see how the current setup is doing now... Please advise.  Thanks.
0
Comment
Question by:swgit
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
5 Comments
 
LVL 19

Accepted Solution

by:
Mal Osborne earned 400 total points
ID: 41787250
100Mb is OK for workstations, however you probably want more bandwidth between switches and servers.

Not sure which version of the 2960 series you have, but all of these devices have optional "GBIC" slots. I would be filling those slots with a heap of 1000BASE-T Ethernet adaptors.

You really should aim to have each switch connected to other switches via gigabit, (or stacked, if that is supported on the particular switches you have). Connections from the 3 servers should also be Gigabit.

Benchmarking is a little tricky, however a modern server with a RAID array, or a performance machine with an SSD can usually saturate a 100Mb connection, but not a 1Gb one.
0
 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:Mal Osborne
ID: 41787254
0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:Gareth Tomlinson CISSP
Gareth Tomlinson CISSP earned 100 total points
ID: 41787588
Either that, or use etherchannel to link the switches. You can use up to 4 interfaces bound together into a port-channel to increase your bandwidth.
SNMP monitoring with PRTG will give you the interface utilisation.
0
 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:Mal Osborne
ID: 41789025
Yeah, you COULD use etherchannel. (The limit is actually 8 channels, not 4, but 4 would probably suffice).

In your scenario, you would need to have 4 etherchannel compatible, 100Mb NICs in  each server, and would consume an extra 18 ports on the switches.

Were it me, I would be spending a few $$s on GBIC 1000baseT adaptors. Not expensive, and way faster and less complex than configuring etherchannel.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:swgit
ID: 41794084
Thanks both!!
0

Featured Post

What Is Transaction Monitoring and who needs it?

Synthetic Transaction Monitoring that you need for the day to day, which ensures your business website keeps running optimally, and that there is no downtime to impact your customer experience.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

For months I had no idea how to 'discover' the IP address of the other end of a link (without asking someone who knows), and it drove me batty. Think about it. You can't use Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) because it's not implemented on the ASAs.…
Many of the companies I’ve worked with have embraced cloud solutions due to their desire to “get out of the datacenter business.” The ability to achieve better security and availability, and the speed with which they are able to deploy, is far grea…
Both in life and business – not all partnerships are created equal. As the demand for cloud services increases, so do the number of self-proclaimed cloud partners. Asking the right questions up front in the partnership, will enable both parties …
As a trusted technology advisor to your customers you are likely getting the daily question of, ‘should I put this in the cloud?’ As customer demands for cloud services increases, companies will see a shift from traditional buying patterns to new…

695 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question