Solved

Fibonacci challenge

Posted on 2016-09-09
11
82 Views
Last Modified: 2016-09-11
Hi,

I am working on below challenge
http://codingbat.com/prob/p120015

Psedo code:
1. if first two numbers return same
2. else call same fibonacci method by passing n-1 and n-2 and sum it up

public int fibonacci(int n) {
  
   if ((n == 0) || (n == 1)) // base cases
      return n;
    else
      // recursion step
      return fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2);
  

}

Open in new window




I am passing all tests
Expected      Run            
fibonacci(0) → 0      0      OK      
fibonacci(1) → 1      1      OK      
fibonacci(2) → 1      1      OK      
fibonacci(3) → 2      2      OK      
fibonacci(4) → 3      3      OK      
fibonacci(5) → 5      5      OK      
fibonacci(6) → 8      8      OK      
fibonacci(7) → 13      13      OK      
other tests
OK      

How to improve/modify my design, code and any other alternate approaches. please advise
0
Comment
Question by:gudii9
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +4
11 Comments
 
LVL 35

Assisted Solution

by:mccarl
mccarl earned 50 total points
ID: 41792555
No improvement necessary, that's about as simple as it gets!
0
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
gurpsbassi earned 250 total points
ID: 41792556
You could get rid of the extra brackets
1
 
LVL 32

Assisted Solution

by:Stefan Hoffmann
Stefan Hoffmann earned 50 total points
ID: 41792630
This again: These tests and tasks are pretty poor. Fibonacci is definied here over N0. Thus a test covering the input -1 should exist. And you should test the input first.
1
 
LVL 26

Assisted Solution

by:dpearson
dpearson earned 50 total points
ID: 41792714
No changes needed - you've nailed this one.

Doug
0
 
LVL 28

Assisted Solution

by:pepr
pepr earned 50 total points
ID: 41792752
I agree with ste5an. On the other hand, this is for learning the basics of programming, and the totally correct solution (with checking of everything, with unit test, and so on) is not necessary to understand the principle (of Fibonacci, and of the recursive solution).

What is important in this case is that you should not remember this recursive solution as the right approach. The reason is that it is extremely ineficient. The non-recursive solution is not more difficult here, and it is much more efficient.
0
Highfive Gives IT Their Time Back

Highfive is so simple that setting up every meeting room takes just minutes and every employee will be able to start or join a call from any room with ease. Never be called into a meeting just to get it started again. This is how video conferencing should work!

 
LVL 32

Assisted Solution

by:phoffric
phoffric earned 50 total points
ID: 41792832
More advanced ways to compute fibonacci(n) really fast - no recursion, and no loops to get to the nth case.
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibformproof.html

The way I learned the closed form solution was to take the z-transform of the equation. Here is a link that describes how to do this.
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51540.html
The difference equation for the Fibonacci series is:
    u(n+2) = u(n+1) + u(n)   with   u(0) = 0,  u(1) = 1
So:

    u(n+2) - u(n+1) - u(n) = 0  

Taking the z-transforms:

    z^2[u(z) - u(0) - u(1)/z] - z[u(z) - u(0)] - u(z) = 0

    u(z)[z^2 - z - 1] - z^2*u(0) - z*u(1) + z*u(0) = 0

Putting u(0) = 0 and u(1) = 1 this becomes:

    u(z)[z^2 - z - 1] =  z

                 z
    u(z) =  -------------
             z^2 - z - 1

The denominator factorizes to:

    [z-1/2 -sqrt(5)/2)][z-1/2 +sqrt(5)/2]

The trick here is to express u(z)/z in partial fractions:

                                1                     1
    u(z)/z =   1/sqrt(5)[ ----------------   - ---------------- ]
                         z-1/2 - sqrt(5)/2     z-1/2 +sqrt(5)/2

and so: 

                            z                     z
    u(z) = 1/sqrt(5)[----------------  - ------------------ ]
                     z-1/2-sqrt(5)/2)      z-1/2+sqrt(5)/2

Then from table of inverse transforms:

       z
    -------  =  a^n    
     z - a

where a is constant. Then:

                              z                       z
    u(z) = 1/sqrt(5) [-------------------- - --------------------]
                       z - (1/2+sqrt(5)/2)    z - (1/2-sqrt(5)/2)

Now from the table of inverse transforms:
    u(n) = 1/sqrt(5)[(1/2+sqrt(5)/2)^n - (1/2-sqrt(5)/2)^n]

Open in new window

2
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:phoffric
ID: 41792846
Here's a graph of the continuous function (i.e., let n be a continuous real positive number) that I asked wolframalpha to plot.
 u(n) = [(1/2+sqrt(5)/2)^n - (1/2-sqrt(5)/2)^n]/sqrt(5)

Open in new window

fib.pnghttp://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+%5B(1%2F2%2Bsqrt(5)%2F2)%5En+-+(1%2F2-sqrt(5)%2F2)%5En%5D%2Fsqrt(5),+where+n+%3D+1+to+8

When n is a positive integer, then u(n) is also a positive integer. Pretty amazing!
In practice, when computing, you probably won't get a positive integer, but a real number that is very close. To get the positive integer, you need to use a round function.
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/java/number_round.htm
1
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:phoffric
ID: 41792858
As n gets larger, the speed at which you compute fibonacci(n) really rocks over the other approaches, whether recursive or just looping. However, if you want a table of the first N values of fibonacci(n), then just adding the previous two integers and storing it into an array of length N will be faster than using fibonacci(n) for all values of n = 1..N, where n is an integer.
1
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:gudii9
ID: 41793631
public int fibonacci(int n) {
  
   if ( n == 0 || n == 1) // base cases
      return n;
    else
      // recursion step
      return fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2);
  

}

Open in new window


got rid of extra brackets. when i have to put and when i can get rid of brackets?
0
 
LVL 35

Expert Comment

by:mccarl
ID: 41793635
They make absolutely NO difference (in this case) to the execution of the code, if it is easy for you to read with them there, leave them there. That's all that it comes down to, how easy it is to read for YOU.
0
 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:dpearson
ID: 41793704
Yes +1 for what mccarl said - I actually think it's a little better with the extra brackets.  You should always prefer clarity and to me the extra with the extra braces is clearer.

Doug
0

Featured Post

Free Trending Threat Insights Every Day

Enhance your security with threat intelligence from the web. Get trending threat insights on hackers, exploits, and suspicious IP addresses delivered to your inbox with our free Cyber Daily.

Join & Write a Comment

Have you tried to learn about Unicode, UTF-8, and multibyte text encoding and all the articles are just too "academic" or too technical? This article aims to make the whole topic easy for just about anyone to understand.
Although it can be difficult to imagine, someday your child will have a career of his or her own. He or she will likely start a family, buy a home and start having their own children. So, while being a kid is still extremely important, it’s also …
This tutorial covers a step-by-step guide to install VisualVM launcher in eclipse.
This video teaches viewers about errors in exception handling.

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

15 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now