VMCity
asked on
DNS Resolution NOT working through VPN
I am trying to set up an internal DNS resolution. Here is the situation.
Company A acquired company B.
Both companies have their own internal wiindows AD/DNS servers.
I setup VPN between A and B..
I can ping company B PC's by IP's from company A
I can ping company A PC's by IP's from company B
The issue is:
I cannot ping company B PC's by host name from company A
I cannot ping company A PC's by host name from company B
Where should this be configured?
1-From windows DNS servers from both A and B?
2-From both firewalls used to setup the VPN between company A and B?
Thanks in advance....
Company A acquired company B.
Both companies have their own internal wiindows AD/DNS servers.
I setup VPN between A and B..
I can ping company B PC's by IP's from company A
I can ping company A PC's by IP's from company B
The issue is:
I cannot ping company B PC's by host name from company A
I cannot ping company A PC's by host name from company B
Where should this be configured?
1-From windows DNS servers from both A and B?
2-From both firewalls used to setup the VPN between company A and B?
Thanks in advance....
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Footech..here is the result of the nslookup test you requested:
C:\Users\Administrator>nsl ookup host.companyB.com.
Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.5.10 ------> local DNS server of companyA from where the nslookup is been run
*** UnKnown can't find nslookup host.companyB.com: Non-existent domain
Thanks,
C:\Users\Administrator>nsl
Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.5.10 ------> local DNS server of companyA from where the nslookup is been run
*** UnKnown can't find nslookup host.companyB.com: Non-existent domain
Thanks,
Hi,
your dns server does not know of domain dns, and that is why it is failing. You need to use stub or conditional forwarder, that will tell dns server from companyA where dns for company is located, and vice versa.
Regards,
Ivan.
your dns server does not know of domain dns, and that is why it is failing. You need to use stub or conditional forwarder, that will tell dns server from companyA where dns for company is located, and vice versa.
Regards,
Ivan.
ASKER
Ivan thanks for your reply..
Assuming I go with a stub zone, it is correct that, one stub zone will have to be created on each company's DNS server?
Thanks,
Assuming I go with a stub zone, it is correct that, one stub zone will have to be created on each company's DNS server?
Thanks,
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Thanks DrDave242 for your detailed answer and the links....
Is a stub zone or conditional forwarders a requirement in order to have userA from companyA authenticate with companyB Active directory server as if userA was created in companyB hence be able to use companyB ressources?
Is a stub zone or conditional forwarders a requirement in order to have userA from companyA authenticate with companyB Active directory server as if userA was created in companyB hence be able to use companyB ressources?
ASKER
Footech , can you please point me to an online ref for an example of such a GP configuration?
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Lot of helpful answers here. I feel a little dirty giving myself more points, so please object if you'd rather see them allocated differently.
ASKER
Hi DrDave242,
I do not remember distributing points. From your last message I believe someone else did. Can you explain how this works?
I didn't do it because i was still waiting till after implementation (maybe there is a time limit i am not aware of). I did it a couple of days ago and it worked. Thank you to for all of you.
It is only after implementation that I understood what "footech" was really talking about (I was more focused on just getting it to work than the convenience part of just being able to use the host name without the DNS suffix between).
If you do not mind I would add 40 points to "feetech".
All of you have been great.
Thank you
I do not remember distributing points. From your last message I believe someone else did. Can you explain how this works?
I didn't do it because i was still waiting till after implementation (maybe there is a time limit i am not aware of). I did it a couple of days ago and it worked. Thank you to for all of you.
It is only after implementation that I understood what "footech" was really talking about (I was more focused on just getting it to work than the convenience part of just being able to use the host name without the DNS suffix between).
If you do not mind I would add 40 points to "feetech".
All of you have been great.
Thank you
@VMCity - When a question is abandoned, experts who have participated in the thread can give recommendations on how the question should be closed. If no recommendations are received, then a cleanup volunteer will take action as they see appropriate. A question is considered abandoned if there hasn't been any comment in 14 days (I think I'm remembering the number of days correctly). I'm fine with the points distribution - no need to reopen the question again to redistribute. Thanks.
ASKER
Thanks for the clarification. I was not aware of these details.
If only the host name, you should test with the FQDN, and the better tool to test name resolution is nslookup.
If you try something like the following from a machine in companyA (notice the trailing dot), do you get a correct result?
Open in new window