Solved

A more efficient LDAP filter

Posted on 2016-09-20
3
98 Views
Last Modified: 2016-09-21
Each attribute here is definitely indexed, but the search takes too long.

What can I do to make it more efficient?

(&(|(mail=John.M.Doe@*)(proxyAddresses=*:John.M.Doe@*))(!(employeeID=123456)))

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:Dallas Smetter
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:sAMAccountName
ID: 41807717
you could try using ambiguous name resolution and scoping the search to a targeted subtree.

I'm on mobile or I'd post a link, but you can easily Google " active directory anr" and get some good info
0
 
LVL 17

Accepted Solution

by:
Learnctx earned 500 total points
ID: 41807889
The reason your response time is so horrible is you have an open ended filter in your query:

(proxyAddresses=*:John.M.Doe@*)

Open in new window


This means you will generate a hugely inefficient query. Even though the attributes are indexed, you're going to end up touching every object in the directory that has a proxyAddresses attribute populated.

Is there any reason you're not specifying the protocol? You would be better to include the protocols you're looking for. Its always better to be more specific if you want a quick result. Either that or you need another attribute which limits the query scope instead of (!(employeeID=123456)).

This should return an instant result.

(&(|(mail=John.M.Doe@*)(proxyAddresses=smtp:John.M.Doe@*)(proxyAddresses=sip:John.M.Doe@*)(proxyAddresses=notes:John.M.Doe@*))(!(employeeID=123456)))

Open in new window


you could try using ambiguous name resolution and scoping the search to a targeted subtree.

ANR is great but in this case won't work any better than just using proxyaddresses, in my opinion.

Edit: There's a good Wiki article here on the MS community Wiki http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/22653.active-directory-ambiguous-name-resolution.aspx
1
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Dallas Smetter
ID: 41809675
Thank you!!!
0

Featured Post

Online Training Solution

Drastically shorten your training time with WalkMe's advanced online training solution that Guides your trainees to action. Forget about retraining and skyrocket knowledge retention rates.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Get average for unknown number of cells per degree.. 3 37
Embed Excel WS into PPTX 4 25
is a device online 4 39
count number 10 28
This article explains the steps required to use the default Photos screensaver to display branding/corporate images
Auditing domain password hashes is a commonly overlooked but critical requirement to ensuring secure passwords practices are followed. Methods exist to extract hashes directly for a live domain however this article describes a process to extract u…
Many functions in Excel can make decisions. The most simple of these is the IF function: it returns a value depending on whether a condition you describe is true or false. Once you get the hang of using the IF function, you will find it easier to us…
Attackers love to prey on accounts that have privileges. Reducing privileged accounts and protecting privileged accounts therefore is paramount. Users, groups, and service accounts need to be protected to help protect the entire Active Directory …

739 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question