• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 113
  • Last Modified:

What task or combo of tasks can I use in ssis 2015 to load different file names into different tables into sql server?

I have a for each look container using folder and filename variables.  The initial dataflow task in the for each loop container does a conditional split on the file name (2 different file names) and inserts into a seperate initial staging table for each file.  The inital data flow has 2 precedence constraints with expression and constraint for the filename and then processes to seperate subsequent dataflows for each file.   Dataflow for file1 is reprocessing 1 extra file.  screenprint attached.
packageflow.docx
0
conardb
Asked:
conardb
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
2 Solutions
 
Jim HornMicrosoft SQL Server Developer, Architect, and AuthorCommented:
What exactly is your question here?
0
 
conardbAuthor Commented:
Is using a dataflow task with conditional split on filename(s) to process different files with different layouts a proper approach to use ssis tasks?    What is your expert opinion?
0
 
Megan BrooksSQL Server ConsultantCommented:
If it works and is fast enough, use it. If you think you might need to support additional filenames in the future, you might want to consider what would facilitate doing that.

You mention both data flow tasks (shown in the attachment) and conditional splits, which are transformations within a data flow task. What is the purpose of testing the filename at both levels?
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
Jim HornMicrosoft SQL Server Developer, Architect, and AuthorCommented:
Not exactly.  Data flows are meant for a single source definition and single destination definition, so if your 'different layouts' implies multiple definitions then this needs to be handled using conditional split logic and multiple data flow tasks (aka data pumps) for each unique source/destination definition.
0
 
conardbAuthor Commented:
ok, thanks... Presently, I have 1 dataflow that is using conditional split logic to select by file name from the same directory each of 2 different files / formats and write to a different staging table for each.  Then seperate dataflows for each of those types derive the fixed length non-delimted row into  seperate sql server tables.  It's working but I suspected not best practice as the filter by name is redundantly used in the initial dataflow then afterward as a precedence to direct processing to derive to seperate tables .  Jim, could you provide an example or link to an example of your approach?  Thanks again.
0
 
Megan BrooksSQL Server ConsultantCommented:
Looking back at your original attachment, it looks like you have a task flow that uses conditional constraints to select one set of sequential data flows or another (conditional split is a data transformation component, not something you would use in the task flow).

Now that I understand the terminology substitutions, the logic looks OK. I only see one set of conditional constraints in the diagram, and there shouldn't be any redundancy in that. Both expressions will be evaluated, but if they are complementary then only one path will continue on for each iteration. Because you are working with constraints, not branching logic, that's what you need to do to use this design.

It seems like it might be clearer if not easier to run two separate for-each loops, eliminating the conditional constraints, and adjusting the file patterns accordingly.

Is the reprocessing that you mentioned initially intended or unintended? Is there a bug to be addressed?
0
 
conardbAuthor Commented:
sorry I took so long, thanks again
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now