Member_2_7966113
asked on
Cisco Route Tagging Problem
Hello Experts,
We have created a network as shown in the topology.
The goal is for subnets/networks in LAN_SW to tagged and the tagged networks to be recognized by routers, CPE, PE CORE_P, REMOTE_PE, REMOTE_CPE and finally placed in the routing table of REMOTE_LAN_SW.
I have tagged the address 7.7.7.7/32 with tag 100 in LAND_SW. However, as you will see in show commands, the tag isn't being picked by eigrp.
Can you please take a look at the configuration and show commands and let me know where I might be going wrong?
I have attached the configuration and show commands
Kind regards
cpatte7372
CORE_P.pdf
CPE.pdf
LAN_SW.pdf
PE.pdf
REMOTE_CPE.pdf
REMOTE_LAN_SW.pdf
REMOTE_PE.pdf
RR.pdf
We have created a network as shown in the topology.
The goal is for subnets/networks in LAN_SW to tagged and the tagged networks to be recognized by routers, CPE, PE CORE_P, REMOTE_PE, REMOTE_CPE and finally placed in the routing table of REMOTE_LAN_SW.
I have tagged the address 7.7.7.7/32 with tag 100 in LAND_SW. However, as you will see in show commands, the tag isn't being picked by eigrp.
Can you please take a look at the configuration and show commands and let me know where I might be going wrong?
I have attached the configuration and show commands
Kind regards
cpatte7372
CORE_P.pdf
CPE.pdf
LAN_SW.pdf
PE.pdf
REMOTE_CPE.pdf
REMOTE_LAN_SW.pdf
REMOTE_PE.pdf
RR.pdf
I have tagged the address 7.7.7.7/32 with tag 100 in LAND_SW. However, as you will see in show commands, the tag isn't being picked by eigrp.What 7.7.7.7/32? I don't see that one configured anywhere. :)
ASKER
One moment please....
ASKER
Hi Predrag,
I meant prefix list
ip prefix-list TAG seq 5 permit 7.7.7.7/32
Cheers
I meant prefix list
ip prefix-list TAG seq 5 permit 7.7.7.7/32
Cheers
There is no 7.7.7.7/32, should be received from somewhere to be inserted in routing table and tagged. How can you tag something that is not there?
Maybe I just can't see it... Do you have it anywhere?
Maybe I just can't see it... Do you have it anywhere?
ASKER
In LAN_SW, there is the following prefix list
ip prefix-list TAG seq 5 permit 7.7.7.7/32
ip prefix-list TAG seq 5 permit 7.7.7.7/32
That is command for tagging, but you do not have that network present.
So, what are you tagging??
7.7.7.7/32 is not present in the routing table of any device (not configured anywhere and not in routing table of any device).
Simplification:
You need to have paper and pen to sign a paper. Pen it your prefix list.
If you want to sign a paper you need to have paper. Route is paper.
Where is your paper???
So, what are you tagging??
7.7.7.7/32 is not present in the routing table of any device (not configured anywhere and not in routing table of any device).
Simplification:
You need to have paper and pen to sign a paper. Pen it your prefix list.
If you want to sign a paper you need to have paper. Route is paper.
Where is your paper???
ASKER
OK,
I added the following static route
ip route 7.7.7.7 255.255.255.255 ethernet 0/0
LAN_SW#show ip eigrp topology
EIGRP-IPv4 Topology Table for AS(100)/ID(9.9.9.9)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 50.50.50.50/32, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible, tag is 10
via 192.168.0.2 (307200/51200), Ethernet0/0
P 100.100.100.100/32, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible, tag is 10
via 192.168.0.2 (307200/51200), Ethernet0/0
P 192.168.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281600
via Connected, Ethernet0/0
P 10.0.40.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 281600, tag is 100
via Rconnected (2560000/0)
P 2.2.2.2/32, 1 successors, FD is 307200, tag is 10
via 192.168.0.2 (307200/51200), Ethernet0/0
P 6.6.6.6/32, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible, tag is 10
via 192.168.0.2 (307200/51200), Ethernet0/0
P 1.1.1.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 128256, tag is 100
via Rconnected (2560000/0)
P 9.9.9.9/32, 1 successors, FD is 128256, tag is 100
via Rconnected (2560000/0)
I added the following static route
ip route 7.7.7.7 255.255.255.255 ethernet 0/0
LAN_SW#show ip eigrp topology
EIGRP-IPv4 Topology Table for AS(100)/ID(9.9.9.9)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 50.50.50.50/32, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible, tag is 10
via 192.168.0.2 (307200/51200), Ethernet0/0
P 100.100.100.100/32, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible, tag is 10
via 192.168.0.2 (307200/51200), Ethernet0/0
P 192.168.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281600
via Connected, Ethernet0/0
P 10.0.40.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 281600, tag is 100
via Rconnected (2560000/0)
P 2.2.2.2/32, 1 successors, FD is 307200, tag is 10
via 192.168.0.2 (307200/51200), Ethernet0/0
P 6.6.6.6/32, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible, tag is 10
via 192.168.0.2 (307200/51200), Ethernet0/0
P 1.1.1.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 128256, tag is 100
via Rconnected (2560000/0)
P 9.9.9.9/32, 1 successors, FD is 128256, tag is 100
via Rconnected (2560000/0)
ASKER
Hi Predrag
I see where I was going wrong.
As you suggested the, the first problem was not having the static route in first place.
The second problem was because I forgot the following command:
redistribute static metric 1000 0 255 1 1500 route-map TAG
Regards
I see where I was going wrong.
As you suggested the, the first problem was not having the static route in first place.
The second problem was because I forgot the following command:
redistribute static metric 1000 0 255 1 1500 route-map TAG
Regards
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Hi Predrag, got there in the end. Cheers mate.
You're welcome.
;)
;)
ASKER
I forgot to add the topology...
Regards
Topology.jpg