Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Cisco ACS Secondary Servers: Certificate Implementation

Posted on 2016-10-10
2
Medium Priority
?
117 Views
Last Modified: 2016-10-11
Is there any downside or up to  importing the local certificates from the primary as opposed to configuring the local certificates manually on the new secondaries?

"New local certificates—You can either configure the local certificates on the secondary servers or import the local certificates from the primary server."

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5-8/installation/guide/csacs_book/csacs_deploy.html
0
Comment
Question by:amigan_99
2 Comments
 
LVL 65

Accepted Solution

by:
btan earned 2000 total points
ID: 41837990
I do not see this configuration as a HA but specific to the certificate requirements, the Certificates is the only thing that isn't sync'd between the primary and secondary systems, so make sure you have a certificate on the backup first regardless of the approach taken.

I view that either choice the ultimate objective is to make sure there is single source of trust in which the root CA and the trusted chain certificate bundle are updated into the two systems and server/client certificate can authenticated during the AAA as well as 802.1X with the issued CA certificate and bundle chain trust available.

As most of the time, the single trust reference is based on primary system amd for ease of oversight for operational works, it is preferable to import form single systems as compared to have managed the two different system certiifcate separately. The chance of misconfiguration will be lesser especially when managing different certificate that has different CA issuance and expiry dates etc.

Eventually, it is more of whether the resource to make sure the synchronisation and update of certificate in the two system can be timely regardless the approach taken. The importing may seems more appropriate but you may need to make sure the hostname can be matched to the system in case of machine authentication otherwise there can be error as the certificate subject name does not match the hostname.

Good to consult the support and OPS team views too dealing woth this PKI - There should be a single enterprise CA that both system can based on instead of generating self signed certificate.

Some discussion on backup in this user forum. See
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11755336/acs-primary-and-secondary-scenario
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:amigan_99
ID: 41838822
Great info. Thank you.
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this blog we highlight approaches to managed security as a service.  We also look into ConnectWise’s value in aiding MSPs’ security management and indicate why critical alerting is a necessary integration.
In this article, we’ll look at how to deploy ProxySQL.
As a trusted technology advisor to your customers you are likely getting the daily question of, ‘should I put this in the cloud?’ As customer demands for cloud services increases, companies will see a shift from traditional buying patterns to new…
Both in life and business – not all partnerships are created equal. Spend 30 short minutes with us to learn:   • Key questions to ask when considering a partnership to accelerate your business into the cloud • Pitfalls and mistakes other partners…

916 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question