Cisco ACS Secondary Servers: Certificate Implementation

Is there any downside or up to  importing the local certificates from the primary as opposed to configuring the local certificates manually on the new secondaries?

"New local certificates—You can either configure the local certificates on the secondary servers or import the local certificates from the primary server."

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5-8/installation/guide/csacs_book/csacs_deploy.html
LVL 2
amigan_99Network EngineerAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

btanExec ConsultantCommented:
I do not see this configuration as a HA but specific to the certificate requirements, the Certificates is the only thing that isn't sync'd between the primary and secondary systems, so make sure you have a certificate on the backup first regardless of the approach taken.

I view that either choice the ultimate objective is to make sure there is single source of trust in which the root CA and the trusted chain certificate bundle are updated into the two systems and server/client certificate can authenticated during the AAA as well as 802.1X with the issued CA certificate and bundle chain trust available.

As most of the time, the single trust reference is based on primary system amd for ease of oversight for operational works, it is preferable to import form single systems as compared to have managed the two different system certiifcate separately. The chance of misconfiguration will be lesser especially when managing different certificate that has different CA issuance and expiry dates etc.

Eventually, it is more of whether the resource to make sure the synchronisation and update of certificate in the two system can be timely regardless the approach taken. The importing may seems more appropriate but you may need to make sure the hostname can be matched to the system in case of machine authentication otherwise there can be error as the certificate subject name does not match the hostname.

Good to consult the support and OPS team views too dealing woth this PKI - There should be a single enterprise CA that both system can based on instead of generating self signed certificate.

Some discussion on backup in this user forum. See
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11755336/acs-primary-and-secondary-scenario
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
amigan_99Network EngineerAuthor Commented:
Great info. Thank you.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Routers

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.