Solved

PL/SQL Two PAYER_IDs with PAYER_TYPES these two types

Posted on 2016-10-18

Oracle Database

1 solution

47 Views

Last Modified: 2016-10-18

Hello expert,

Payers have PAYER_IDS and PAYER_TYPE_CODES.
Looking for Payers that have two PAYER_TYPE_CODES
where those two PAYER_TYPES_CODES are 17001 and 17002.

Tried the query copied herewith below.
Returns all PAYER_IDS w PAYER_TYPE__CODES 17002
not just the PAYER_IDS w PAYER_TYPE__CODES 17002
and PAYER_TYPE__CODES 17001

Tried the query copied below with AND instead of OR
but this returned no rows.

Also tried WHERE IN (17001, 17002) Returns similar to OR.

I think I have done this using paretheses but can't remember.

Thanks.

Allen Pitts, Dallas Texas

With cte as (
select
PAyer_ID
FROM
CCM_PAYER_TYPE
group by PAyer_ID
having Count(*) =2
order by PAYER_ID)
SELECT PAYER_TYPE_ID,
CTE.PAYER_ID,
PAYER_TYPE_CODE
FROM CTE
join CCM_PAYER_TYPE PAT on PAT.payer_id =CTE.payer_id
where (PAYER_TYPE_CODE = 17001 or
PAYER_TYPE_CODE = 17002)
order by 2, 3

Comment

Question by:9apit

[X]

Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

Help others & share knowledge
Earn cash & points
Learn & ask questions

Join The Community

4 Comments

LVL 77

Accepted Solution

by:slightwv (䄆 Netminder)

slightwv (䄆 Netminder) earned 500 total points

ID: 418489882016-10-18

You didn't provide any sample data or expected results so I dummied up some test data that I think is what you are after.

Take a look at the select below. If it isn't correct, please add to the test case and explain where it went wrong.

/*
--drop table tab1 purge;
create table tab1(payer_ids number, payer_type_codes number);

insert into tab1 values(1,17001);
insert into tab1 values(1,17002);
insert into tab1 values(2,17001);
insert into tab1 values(2,17003);
insert into tab1 values(3,17001);
insert into tab1 values(3,17001);
insert into tab1 values(4,17001);
commit;
*/

select payer_ids from (
	select payer_ids,
		count(case when payer_type_codes = 17001 then 1 end) has_17001,
		count(case when payer_type_codes = 17002 then 1 end) has_17002,
		count(*) total_count
	from tab1
	group by payer_ids
)
where total_count=2 and has_17001=1 and has_17002=1
/

Open in new window

Author Closing Comment

by:9apit

ID: 418490062016-10-18

Thanks. Works. Tested solution:

with CTE as
(
select payer_id from (
      select payer_id,
            count(case when payer_type_code = 17001 then 1 end) has_17001,
            count(case when payer_type_code = 17002 then 1 end) has_17002,
            count(*) total_count
      from CCM_PAYER_TYPE
      group by payer_id
)
where total_count=2 and has_17001=1 and has_17002=1
)
SELECT
CTE.PAYER_ID,
PAYER_TYPE_CODE
from CTE
join CCM_PAYER_TYPE PAT on CTE.PAYER_ID = PAT.PAYER_ID

LVL 77

Expert Comment

by:slightwv (䄆 Netminder)

ID: 418490222016-10-18

CTE's are nice when you need them but you really don't need it here.

Here is a revised test case with two tables that pulls data from both:

/*
drop table tab1 purge;
create table tab1(payer_id number, payer_type_codes number);

insert into tab1 values(1,17001);
insert into tab1 values(1,17002);
insert into tab1 values(2,17001);
insert into tab1 values(2,17003);
insert into tab1 values(3,17001);
insert into tab1 values(3,17001);
insert into tab1 values(4,17001);
commit;

drop table tab2 purge;
create table tab2(payer_id number, some_other_column char(1));
insert into tab2 values(1,'A');
insert into tab2 values(2,'B');
commit;
*/

select t1.payer_id, t2.some_other_column from (
	select payer_id,
		count(case when payer_type_codes = 17001 then 1 end) has_17001,
		count(case when payer_type_codes = 17002 then 1 end) has_17002,
		count(*) total_count
	from tab1
	group by payer_id
) t1
join tab2 t2 on t1.payer_id=t2.payer_id
where total_count=2 and has_17001=1 and has_17002=1
/

Open in new window

LVL 77

Expert Comment

by:slightwv (䄆 Netminder)

ID: 418490262016-10-18

You can even move the join inside the outer query but you need to join on all the columns you want. You would need to test them to see which performs better:

select payer_id, some_other_column from (
	select t1.payer_id, t2.some_other_column,
		count(case when payer_type_codes = 17001 then 1 end) has_17001,
		count(case when payer_type_codes = 17002 then 1 end) has_17002,
		count(*) total_count
	from tab1 t1 join tab2 t2 on t1.payer_id=t2.payer_id
	group by t1.payer_id, some_other_column
) t1
where total_count=2 and has_17001=1 and has_17002=1
/

Open in new window

Featured Post

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

How to use Access Control Lists in Oracle

Article by: sdstuber

Working with Network Access Control Lists in Oracle 11g (part 1) Part 2: http://www.e-e.com/A_9074.html So, you upgraded to a shiny new 11g database and all of a sudden every program that used UTL_MAIL, UTL_SMTP, UTL_TCP, UTL_HTTP or any oth…

Oracle Database

(Oracle) Truncate or Delete which one to use...??

Article by: Wasim Akram

Truncate is a DDL Command where as Delete is a DML Command. Both will delete data from table, but what is the difference between these below statements truncate table <table_name> ?? delete from <table_name> ?? The first command cannot be …