Solved

EXCH2013 with DAG and Loadbalancer

Posted on 2016-11-03
11
64 Views
Last Modified: 2016-11-07
Hi Experts,

with the old version of EX2007 we used the windows internal loadbalancer NLB on both HUBCAS servers.

With EX2013 I can create a DAG but this is just for mailbox DB redundancy.

My new EX2013 servers are installed as MULTIROLE server, with MBX,CAS,HUB role.
How to distribute the traffic through all HUBCAS servers ?
0
Comment
Question by:Eprs_Admin
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
11 Comments
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Amit
ID: 41872803
You need to place HLB in your environment for HA for CAS role. MBX DAG is enough. NLB is not recommended.
1
 
LVL 4
ID: 41873066
Create round robin through internal DNS.  Some people will say that its not efficient, but it does work.  I have 1 domain environment, and 2 EX servers.  Create new ZONE with your SMTP address.  E.g. Mail.domain.com.  Add two HOST A records. One for EX1 and another for EX2.  
Create your DAG quorom or "Witness directory" and give it its own I.P address.  

We have a smaller environment of 300+, but I can tell you from experience, that if failover occurs it is less than 5 minutes for email to be connected back to the users from the passive EX server and becoming the active server.
1
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Amit
ID: 41873373
@Todd..

Pls tell me, if exchange service not responding...will your dns round robin will failover to second server?
0
Does Powershell have you tied up in knots?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

 

Author Comment

by:Eprs_Admin
ID: 41873567
OK,

that means I cannot use WNLB in my EX2013 environment.
For now I have no hardware loadbalancer.
I have my hardware firewall. This firewall has also the feature for balancing traffic.
But this is just from external to internal.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Eprs_Admin
ID: 41873838
So WNLB is not recommended ?
But hardware load balancer from my Firewall is ok ?
0
 
LVL 4
ID: 41874542
@Amit

Yes to your question. If you are asking if my EX1 is shutdown, it fails over to EV2, every time.
0
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Amit
ID: 41874594
@Todd,

I didn't asked shutdown, I asked service not responding. What happens then. Does your Round-robin failover.
0
 
LVL 4
ID: 41874671
That I don't know.
0
 
LVL 43

Assisted Solution

by:Amit
Amit earned 250 total points
ID: 41874757
@Todd,

No problem...

Here are the primary reason for not using or recommend DNS round-robin:

 1) Monitoring: How you are going to monitor DNS Round-Robin for any issue.
 2) You cannot distribute load using DNS RR.
 3) With DNS RR Active/Passive setup not possible.
 4) No reporting
 5) DNS RR is not application aware solution, so if Exchange server is down, client might still be connecting to failed server.

 HLB is must requirement for Exchange. I known it add extra cost to the overall setup, however MS recommended to use HLB.
0
 
LVL 4

Accepted Solution

by:
get-ADuser -F ($_.Name -eq "Todd") earned 250 total points
ID: 41874898
Yes Amit,

I have definitely heard of those exact reasons that you have mentioned.  I also proposed a HLB that was around $2500.00.  Mostly because of worrying about what you said,  Not able to be application aware.  But because of the expense of Exchange plus Veritas Enterprise Vault, that is on the back burner.

@ Eprs_Admin

From a best practice standpoint I cannot dispute what Amit has.  My environment is only 300+ users and I am the AD admin and Exchange Admin.  Because of this I am constantly aware of what is going on.  I can say that if one of my EX Servers is "out"  the other seems to kick on fairly quickly.  But only if the system is shutdown.  I cannot say that if any of the other situations that Amit has stated above, that it would give the same result.  HLB's are much better than RR. For now it works fine for us.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Eprs_Admin
ID: 41876698
Thanks first of all I will go for RR and next year I go for a HLB.
0

Featured Post

Moving data to the cloud? Find out if you’re ready

Before moving to the cloud, it is important to carefully define your db needs, plan for the migration & understand prod. environment. This wp explains how to define what you need from a cloud provider, plan for the migration & what putting a cloud solution into practice entails.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

How to resolve IMCEAEX NDRs in Exchange or Exchange Online related to invalid X500 addresses.
Check out this step-by-step guide for using the newly updated Experts Exchange mobile app—released on May 30.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing of Data Protection Manager on a server running Windows Server 2012 R2, including the prerequisites. Microsoft .Net 3.5 is required. To install this feature, go to Server Manager…
In this Micro Video tutorial you will learn the basics about Database Availability Groups and How to configure one using a live Exchange Server Environment. The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability grou…

615 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question