Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people, just like you, are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
Solved

MIcrosoft SQL, query with ANY joins

Posted on 2016-11-03
13
40 Views
Last Modified: 2016-11-04
I am having trouble displaying one of the columns in this query:

SIN, last name, and salary of employees who earn more than $80,000, if they are managers show the branch name of their branch in a fourth column (which should be NULL for most employees), order by salary in decreasing order
The restrictions is I have to create without any joins

Currently My output is this:

sin              lastName      salary      branchName
55700      Edwards              99289      NULL
95246      Garcia              98773      NULL

the problem is that the branchName for ALL rows are NULL
This is what I have done so far:
SELECT E.sin, E.lastName, E.salary, b.branchName
  FROM Employee E, Branch B
  WHERE B.managerSIN = E.sin AND E.sin <> B.managerSIN
UNION
SELECT E.sin, E.lastName, E.salary, null
  FROM Employee E
 WHERE NOT EXISTS (
                   SELECT *
                     FROM Branch B
                    WHERE E.salary < 80000
                  )
ORDER BY salary DESC

Open in new window


Here are the relevant tables:
Employee = {sin, firstName, lastName, salary, branchNumber(FK-Branch)}
Branch = {branchNumber, branchName, managerSIN(FK-Employee), budget}
where FK = foreign key and underline = primary key
0
Comment
Question by:Bob Tian
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2
13 Comments
 
LVL 52

Assisted Solution

by:_agx_
_agx_ earned 250 total points
ID: 41873191
If I'm understanding correctly, I think you just need an OUTER JOIN.
SELECT E.sin
	, E.lastName
	, E.salary
	, b.branchName
FROM   Employee E LEFT JOIN Branch B ON B.managerSIN = E.sin 
WHERE  E.salary > 80000
ORDER BY E.salary DESC

Open in new window

1
 

Author Comment

by:Bob Tian
ID: 41873196
The problem is that I am not allowed to use any join operations, so an outer join would not be possible
0
 
LVL 52

Expert Comment

by:_agx_
ID: 41873199
I am not allowed to use any join operations

Why not? You're already using a JOIN in the first query of the UNION...
1
Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

 
LVL 52

Assisted Solution

by:_agx_
_agx_ earned 250 total points
ID: 41873202
FROM Employee E, Branch B
  WHERE B.managerSIN = E.sin

That's a JOIN, albeit using the old ANSI-89 syntax, which is strongly discouraged.
1
 
LVL 52

Expert Comment

by:_agx_
ID: 41873212
This is not possible without some sort of JOIN.
1
 
LVL 28

Assisted Solution

by:Pawan Kumar
Pawan Kumar earned 250 total points
ID: 41873357
Try this , It is possible with out join keyword.

SELECT E.sin
      , E.lastName
      , E.salary
      , b.branchName
FROM   Employee E , Branch B
WHERE  B.managerSIN = E.sin AND E.salary > 80000
ORDER BY E.salary DESC
1
 
LVL 52

Expert Comment

by:_agx_
ID: 41873717
@Pawan - That excludes any records where the managersin is null, due to the inner join.
1
 
LVL 28

Accepted Solution

by:
Pawan Kumar earned 250 total points
ID: 41873720
@_agx_  -- No It will do the CROSS JOIN.

SELECT E.sin
      , E.lastName
      , E.salary
      , b.branchName
FROM   Employee E , Branch B
WHERE  ( B.managerSIN = E.sin AND E.salary > 80000 ) OR ( B.managerSIN IS NULL )
ORDER BY E.salary DESC
1
 
LVL 52

Expert Comment

by:_agx_
ID: 41874196
No It will do the CROSS JOIN.

I meant your first pass. Though the second is still a little off - missing an extra salary filter.  

I would not recommend using ANSI-89 syntax. Not without a very good reason. That style is essentially deprecated, and is less clear IMO. However the sql is written, you still need some sort of JOIN.  May as well do it the correct right way and use SQL-92+ syntax, ie OUTER JOIN :-)
1
 
LVL 28

Expert Comment

by:Pawan Kumar
ID: 41874198
Yes sir you are correct. Its an old syntax and should be avoided. :)

I never use it. Its just for the question.

Regards,
Pawan
1
 
LVL 28

Expert Comment

by:Pawan Kumar
ID: 41874201
@Bob Tian - Please check if my suggestion works for you ?

Regards,
Pawan
1
 

Author Comment

by:Bob Tian
ID: 41874894
Hello,

I have managed to get this working, thanks for your help!
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The Delta outage: 650 cancelled flights, more than 1200 delayed flights, thousands of frustrated customers, tens of millions of dollars in damages – plus untold reputational damage to one of the world’s most trusted airlines. All due to a catastroph…
Ever wondered why sometimes your SQL Server is slow or unresponsive with connections spiking up but by the time you go in, all is well? The following article will show you how to install and configure a SQL job that will send you email alerts includ…
Using examples as well as descriptions, and references to Books Online, show the documentation available for date manipulation functions and by using a select few of these functions, show how date based data can be manipulated with these functions.
Via a live example combined with referencing Books Online, show some of the information that can be extracted from the Catalog Views in SQL Server.

808 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question