Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Backup DHCP Server

Posted on 2016-11-07
8
Medium Priority
?
180 Views
Last Modified: 2016-11-07
Hi Guys,
Currently, I have one server room, we are going to install a second server room at the back of a large building. The main reason for this is, in the event of a fire, we will have a copy of the sql server so we can resume business. all the office pc (2 dozen) will be physically uplugged from the primary network into secondary network.

Since the two database servers will be connected via fiber optics approx 300 feet away, should 1 use a failover DHCP or a seperate DHCP?

You're help is greatly appreciated.
0
Comment
Question by:S Khan
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 3
8 Comments
 
LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 41877979
If it's on the same network, use a split scope - half your DHCP addresses are handed out by each server.  If one does down, the other can handle all of the network.  Otherwise, whichever DHCP server answers first provides the address
0
 

Author Comment

by:S Khan
ID: 41877991
Hi Lee, in the event of a fire all the cables will be burnt, so the office pc's will be severed,  so i will be running a separate network. my main focus is to have a backup of the entire database.  I would have to physically connect the office pc to the backup DHCP server.
Do i replicate the DHCP or have a seperate one?

Here is the flow of the primary room
WAN>SonicWALL>DHCP>SQL

Here is the flow of the backup room
Backup WAN > SonicWALL>DHCP>SQL etc.
0
 
LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 41877997
I'm confused - WHY would you run a separate network?  Just have redundant services in two locations - or use Hyper-V replica.  Ditch the sonicwall and use a VM based solution (I prefer Untangle, but PFSense and other third party systems exist that can run as a VM - and since they are running as a VM you can fail them over.
0
Windows Server 2016: All you need to know

Learn about Hyper-V features that increase functionality and usability of Microsoft Windows Server 2016. Also, throughout this eBook, you’ll find some basic PowerShell examples that will help you leverage the scripts in your environments!

 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:Mal Osborne
ID: 41878009
I would not use a second DHCP server. When a Windows machine boots, with an existing DHCP lease it attempts to ping the default gateway, and if it can, keeps using that lease. The default Windows DHCP lease is 8 days, leases are renewed once half expired, so clients will be fine with no DHCP server for 4 days.  You could even extend the lease time, maybe to 30 days, giving you 2 weeks grace.

Longer leases can be a problem f you have a lot of devices intermittently in use and not a lot of spare IP addresses. If for instance, a visitor plugs in a laptop, and it gets a lease, that IP cannot be used for 8 days. It is possible to therefore run out of IP addresses.
0
 

Author Comment

by:S Khan
ID: 41878013
In a fire we will loose the entire room, WAN, SonicWALL, Switches. firewall etc, The only thing that remain is a burn out Ethernet cable.
We are planning for worst case scenario.
0
 

Author Comment

by:S Khan
ID: 41878015
also the backup DHCP will be using another gateway.
0
 
LVL 96

Accepted Solution

by:
Lee W, MVP earned 2000 total points
ID: 41878024
In a fire we will loose the entire room, WAN, SonicWALL, Switches. firewall etc, The only thing that remain is a burn out Ethernet cable.
We are planning for worst case scenario.

OK, so I'll repeat...  WHY would you run a separate network?

You don't need a separate network.  If you are convinced that the entire building won't be affected, but just want redundancy, KEEP the same logical network.  There's no reason you've presented that says you can't.

Is there a reason you're not virtualizing?  If you are, is there are a reason you're not replicating?

What your describing sounds like what an inexperienced person might try to design for a disaster - but there are FAR better and less complex ways of doing this.

BTW, the worst case scenario is the entire building burns down.  In which case you need OFF-SITE redundancy - again, something replica can do!
0
 

Author Comment

by:S Khan
ID: 41878042
Actually you're right, same network, different location with a separate WAN.
All the machines are virtual,  Thank you for the guidance.
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Scenerio: You have a server running Server 2003 and have applied a retail pack of Terminal Server Licenses.  You want to change servers or your server has crashed and you need to reapply the Terminal Server Licenses. When you enter the 16-digit lic…
Restoring deleted objects in Active Directory has been a standard feature in Active Directory for many years, yet some admins may not know what is available.
We’ve all felt that sense of false security before—locking down external access to a database or component and feeling like we’ve done all we need to do to secure company data. But that feeling is fleeting. Attacks these days can happen in many w…
Are you ready to place your question in front of subject-matter experts for more timely responses? With the release of Priority Question, Premium Members, Team Accounts and Qualified Experts can now identify the emergent level of their issue, signal…
Suggested Courses

609 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question