Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 111
  • Last Modified:

exchange 2013

in exchange 2010 and exchange 2013 database are no longer associated with particular storage group or server rather they are moved to Org level.
0
pramod1
Asked:
pramod1
1 Solution
 
IvanSystem EngineerCommented:
Hi,

that is correct.
Storage groups have been removed, and databases are not pined to server, rather they are associated with Organization.
As a result, you don't have CCR and such high availability solutions, but you have DAG, which requires no special storage to allow redundancy. With just 2 servers you can create DAG and you are on the horse :)

You can read about redundancy at 2010/2013 at: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335211(v=exchg.141).aspx

Has the time for migration came? :)

Regards,
Ivan.
0
 
pramod1Author Commented:
so how database associated with organization is better than storage groups linked to server if failure occurs
0

Featured Post

Simplify Active Directory Administration

Administration of Active Directory does not have to be hard.  Too often what should be a simple task is made more difficult than it needs to be.The solution?  Hyena from SystemTools Software.  With ease-of-use as well as powerful importing and bulk updating capabilities.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now