Solved

Domain join remote sites or not

Posted on 2016-11-13
3
76 Views
Last Modified: 2016-11-17
I have a dilemma whereby many of my remote sites are workgroup machines that connect to Citrix in HQ. The remote sites now have a dedicated connection (varying bandwidth speeds) to the main HQ network. I'm weighing up the pros and cons of domain joining. From a visibility point of view for software and application licenses domain joining doesn't seem to really give me more visibility but I'm open to correction. It seems I still need a third party tool such as Symantec Altiris to control in bulk

Driving users out of Citrix and onto their local machine also introduces more admin overhead. I'm interested to get opinions from admins that have faced this decision. My end goal is to get better visibility on Windows versions, Office versions etc as there are a large amount of machines on the remote sites, thanks.
0
Comment
Question by:Sid_F
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 58

Assisted Solution

by:Cliff Galiher
Cliff Galiher earned 125 total points
ID: 41885674
For centralized management, from security to credential management, I always recommend domain joining. I don't think workgroups effectively scales beyond 5 or so machines. While you can get away with it, in a crisis event, you'll suddenly regret not having better management of the desktops.

Azure AD is also a modern alternative if you have a management solution such as Intune that can integrate.
0
 
LVL 28

Accepted Solution

by:
masnrock earned 250 total points
ID: 41885849
Join the domain as long as you have a decent amount of bandwidth. Makes it easier to manage the workstations centrally, and also reduces the amount of dependency on Citrix. Plus depending on the applications that need to be accessed at HQ, this should make for an easier experience. If anything, I'd be figuring out whether each remote site has sufficient bandwidth at each site to run all of the application and let that determine the next step on how to handle the site.
0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:Kylo Ren
Kylo Ren earned 125 total points
ID: 41886590
i would join the machines to the domain just so that passwords and group policies can be centrally managed.  Make sure that your gpos arent disabling the cached credentials option otherwise users will be locked out if the site to site vpn goes down.  I would continue to use citrix since its an awesome solution.  You get the best of both worlds with this solution (centralized app management via citrix and domain controller benefits for all remote stations)
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Background Information Recently I have fixed file server permission issues for one of my client. The client has 1800 users and one Windows Server 2008 R2 domain joined file server with 12 TB of data, 250+ shared folders and the folder structure i…
An article on effective troubleshooting
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to join and promote the first Windows Server 2012 domain controller into an Active Directory environment running on Windows Server 2008. Determine the location of the FSMO roles by lo…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…

710 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question