ethernet cat5e lenght 80m

Dear experts,

I need to lay ethernet 5e cable in college building. The building has 10 floors and I need to lay 1 cable for each floor, because each floor is connected to specific Mikrotik router port.

The problem is that from 10th floor to server room is it about 80 to 100 meters. Each floor is limited to 17mbps, so I don't need higher speed.

Do you have some real experience or a link to some trusted info about it?


Regards,
Jarda
LVL 7
Jaroslav LatalMSPAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
JustInCaseConnect With a Mentor Commented:
But, I have used cable longer than 100m, in my environment( I think it was 250-300m) and it worked just fine.
No way with copper!
:)
Typically copper cable work up to 125 and also speed typically is 10Mb in that case. Signal is so degraded that 100Mb is impossible.
(There are also other reasons why cable should not be longer).

I agree with Dr. Klahn. Buy better Quality cables (cat 6a or higher) to be future proof. Always place multimode fiber between buildings if budget allows it.
0
 
AntzsInfrastructure ServicesCommented:
The longer the cable does not actually relate to the speed in which data travels.  The max 100m Ethernet cable length is just a TIA standard.  For any cable longer than 100m an active device is required in between the cables to boost up the signal to prevent signal drops.

But, I have used cable longer than 100m, in my environment( I think it was 250-300m) and it worked just fine.  That said, I still prefer to follow the recommended standard unless the situation does not gives you the choice to follow the standard.
0
 
Dr. KlahnConnect With a Mentor Principal Software EngineerCommented:
Considering that the demand for bandwidth is at least doubling every decade, I'd pull at least two fibers in addition to the copper.  In less than ten years you'll need it.  It's less expensive over the long run to pull it now than to go back later and pay for another pull.
0
Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

 
John TsioumprisConnect With a Mentor Software & Systems EngineerCommented:
You also have 2 other options
1. Move the router to an inbetween floor ...e.g. 4th so the lengths of the cable are considerable shorter
2 Use CAT6 cable that is rated for 100m...
0
 
Jaroslav LatalMSPAuthor Commented:
So I will pull Datacom Cat5e cable and will see what happen. In the worst case I will later buy some cheap switch and put it somewhere between.

There is about 20 devices on each floor, 2 buildings with 10 floors each. About 400 active devices (students) shares 300mbps internet connectivity. As a router, I used 24 port Mikrotik for $160. Poor students... But the budget is not so high.

Do you agree with this solution or I will beat my head against the wall in few days?


Kind regards,
Jarda
0
 
JustInCaseCommented:
I typed answer for cables only. For design consideration more details should be provided (including basic topology and list of devices in use).

But from what I read, why wait for few days? Start beat your head against the wall right now.
😊

For start place 2 fibers between buildings (if not already present), at least that's what I would do (Dr.Klahn also suggested it).
0
 
Jaroslav LatalMSPAuthor Commented:
Those buildings are very close together (20 meters). They will not pay fibers or some sophisticated solution, there is no budget for it.

Now there is one router, one cable to each building. On a 1st floor is 100mbps switch, from this switch it's connected to another switch on 2nd floor and so on. Simple cascade of 10 switches in each building. When one switch fails, the rest of building doesn't work.

Should I spend $1000 for a "small upgrade" described above or let it as is.


Thanks,
Jarda
0
 
Jaroslav LatalMSPAuthor Commented:
Thanks a lot for help!
0
 
JustInCaseCommented:
You know limitations, those are just best practice sugestions.
Typical design is L3 switch per building.

Where you will most likely have problem is natting for 400 hosts (but again don't know complete design). NAT uses router's CPU for work and is not offloaded to a ASIC. So that can become a huge problem, since it can effectively kill your router.
1
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.