cloaking

rgb192
rgb192 used Ask the Experts™
on
Cloaking is a search engine optimization (SEO) technique in which the content presented to the search engine spider is different from that presented to the user's browser. This is done by delivering content based on the IP addresses or the User-Agent HTTP header of the user requesting the page.


matt cutts of google states that websites who have two different websites (one for google to see) are punished in the search engine


forbes.com does not show googleBOT a pay-wall or ask googlebot to sign up for their website

so forbes.com is cloaking

Is this word used anymore or does this word only apply to flash websites (no words) where a totally different text page was for bots to see
Comment
Watch Question

Do more with

Expert Office
EXPERT OFFICE® is a registered trademark of EXPERTS EXCHANGE®
Dave BaldwinFixer of Problems
Most Valuable Expert 2014
Commented:
so forbes.com is cloaking
I don't think so.  It's only considered cloaking if you are trying to fool the search engine.  If you look at http://www.forbes.com/robots.txt you will see that Forbes has blocked the search engines from scanning much of their website.
Aaron TomoskyDirector of Solutions Consulting
Commented:
Another form of cloaking is having HTML for googlebot, but using JavaScript to replace or hid div sections.
Jackie Man IT Manager
Top Expert 2010
Commented:
http://www.freemarketingzone.com/search-engine-optimization/cloaking.html

Cloaking are being used as follows.

Flash Technology Based Websites
There are lots of web sites that are built in flash only. As you may know, flash is not recommended for SEO purposes. However, companies don't want to rebuild their web sites and rewrite everything in plain HTML. So they create content rich web pages and provide them to SEs and flash pages to visitors. (Note that Google has already started indexing sites in plain flash, but many other search engines still don't).

Image Gallery Websites
Image gallery websites obviously have more images than the actual content on their pages. So, webmasters think that cloaking could help them get top placement for keywords like "image gallery".

HTML Rich Websites
Search engine optimization experts suggest having less HTML code and more real text on your pages. Sometimes, source code takes 95% or 98% of the whole web page's content. In order to avoid redesigning every web page, webmasters discover a much easier solution - cloaking.
Ensure you’re charging the right price for your IT

Do you wonder if your IT business is truly profitable or if you should raise your prices? Learn how to calculate your overhead burden using our free interactive tool and use it to determine the right price for your IT services. Start calculating Now!

Most Valuable Expert 2011
Top Expert 2016
Commented:
I think you've got pretty good answers here, but I'll add a bit of a question of my own to the mix.  Consider pages that are Single-Page-Applications (SPA), such as those made from AngularJS applications.  Examples abound: Twitter, Facebook, Ebay, parts of Amazon, many news sites, etc.  The goal of this design is to have a web site that more closely mimics a native phone app (knowing that there is more mobile traffic on the internet every day).  These sites typically do not load their content until you scroll it into the viewport.

The AngularJS framework is a Google invention.  I doubt they would penalize sites for using this, right?  I think the answer is that they would not penalize sites for using AngularJS, but it's worth considering the question.

There are thoroughly legitimate reasons to load an HTML document that is all or partly stubs, then flesh out the visual material with JavaScript.  It frustrates screen scraper applications, something you want to do with CAPTCHA applications (see using AJAX to hide the CAPTCHA string).  It's also something you might want to do if part of your content is licensed, and it's a technique that is useful in certain security issues.

I normally browse with cookies and local storage turned off, selectively turning them on for sites I choose.  An interesting effect I've seen recently is a blank screen from CNN.  They have since walked that "feature" back.  And you may have read of the recent video "click fraud" cases, where simulated browsers were elevating the view counts on YouTube (a Google property).  Clearly the browser behavior is an important issue.  For Google to have business integrity, it needs to know that its 'bots are seeing the same things that humans are seeing.

I understand Matt Cutts position.  He was especially concerned about sites that showed Google something that was materially different from what was presented to the client via the browser.  And much of Google's popularity algorithm (in the early 2000s) was based on links - how many other sites linked to your site*.  But I think there are some soft areas today, and the Google Penalty is largely understood by webmasters, who now know well enough to follow the guidelines.  Cloaking, of the deceptive kind described in the old article from FreeMarketingZone, is mostly an ancient artifact.  Nobody would do that any more.

* Today, Google has the money and resources to use Google bots that precisely mimic a client browser, and the machine learning technology to "see" what you see.  But in those early days, Google was a screen scraper, reading the HTML and content and building its indexes from clear text.  I exploited this by creating common page footers among all the sites I supported.  The page footers were essentially invisible to the human client, but the screen scraper saw HTML loaded with keywords and links that looked just like all the other HTML on the page.  To say this was successful would be to wildly understate the conditions.  At one time, I had the top search results for "National" and the client was a private elementary school.  That's what Matt Cutts was responding to -- a deliberate attempt to manipulate Google's results.
Brandon LyonWeb Developer/Designer

Commented:
There is  a policy called "first click free"  where Google allows you to paywall after a certain number of free visits.

Author

Commented:
thanks best is browsing habits

Do more with

Expert Office
Submit tech questions to Ask the Experts™ at any time to receive solutions, advice, and new ideas from leading industry professionals.

Start 7-Day Free Trial