scanning photo's

several years ago - i scanned my old photo's with an HP AIO  -don't remember the type
now i lost them all (by running a chkdsk on a drive) , and want to rescan them again
At that time, i could put 2-6 photo's on it and scan them in 1 session - the software separated and stored each picture separately.
is there some (preferably free) software around that can do this? or does this exist on other HP AIO models?
or do you have other solutions? (a scan shop is not a solution!)
LVL 95
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

You can try this one:

ScanSpeeder is very easy to use photo scanning software that will speed up the process of scanning your old photos. Put as many photos as you can fit on your flatbed scanner at once. ScanSpeeder will split the photos into separate image files.
Another solution: GIMP + ADDONS...

Article on "how to" here:
nobusAuthor Commented:
that seems to do what i need - nbut it is not free
so keep the ideas coming !
Become a CompTIA Certified Healthcare IT Tech

This course will help prep you to earn the CompTIA Healthcare IT Technician certification showing that you have the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in installing, managing, and troubleshooting IT systems in medical and clinical settings.

RaminTechnical AdvisorCommented:
if you have Photoshop on your system you can do it,  file menu > Automate > Crop and Straighten Photos, refer to below link for more details,
nobusAuthor Commented:
ok  - i'll try them both - but i wonder if there is no solution that says "that it does not screw up" both do say
The software is not perfect! Depends on the quality of the scanner and a little bit of AI...

I wouldn't be too concerned with that!

Any help the software gives (especially the free ones) is a gift!
nobusAuthor Commented:
i agree - and up to now you're the winner - but lets wait a couple of days  to see if other ideas come in
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Hi nobus,
I created a 5-minute EE video Micro Tutorial that addresses your question (and the solution uses free software):

How to divide/split a single image file into multiple image files

Regards, Joe

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
nobusAuthor Commented:
Joe - that's a nice way. i assume the fastest way to use it is first scanning all photo's, - then run gimp on all?
or is it better to run gimp directly after the scan?
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Hi nobus,
You may as well do it all in GIMP, unless you have a strong preference for some other scanning software. What scanner or AIO do you have now? Whatever it is, it almost surely has TWAIN and/or WIA drivers, which GIMP supports. So you may do these steps in GIMP:


That will give you a Select Source dialog that looks something like this:

GIMP Select Source
Select one of those for your AIO and use it to scan. Here's what the TWAIN and WIA dialogs look like for one of my Brother MFCs:

After scanning, do Filters>Divide Scanned Images, as explained in the video Micro Tutorial.

If you want to view each split image before you save it, do not tick the Save and Close Extracted Images box. This will allow you to view each split image in a GIMP window before saving it. But if you're fine with letting the Divide Scanned Images script do the saves automatically, tick the Save and Close Extracted Images box in its dialog.

I just tested this method with both TWAIN and WIA on an AIO (the Brother MFC shown in the screenshot above) — worked perfectly! Of course, if you prefer other scanning software, do the scan first with that software and then split the image in GIMP. In that case, I'd be inclined to do it one flatbed load at a time, i.e., place a set of photos on the flatbed, use your scanning software to do the scan, split the image in GIMP, verify that the split images are to your satisfaction — wash, rinse, repeat. :)

Another approach is to do all of your scans at once (or many of them, if not all) and put them in the same folder. Then use the Batch feature of Divide Scanned Images, which is available via the Filters>Batch Tools menu in GIMP:

batch divide menu
When you run that, it gives this dialog:

batch divide dialog
Fill it in and it will process all of the images in the source folder ("Load from:"), assigning a unique suffix to the file name of each extracted image that it puts in the destination folder ("Save Directory:").

I'd like to acknowledge Rob Antonishen, who developed DivideScannedImages and BatchDivideScannedImages.

Regards, Joe
nobusAuthor Commented:
Joe i have different AIO's
the actual i'm trying to install on my win7 64 bit is the photosmart 3310
but i have also the C4180  and the B109 available, if needed
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Should not matter what AIO it is, as long as it has TWAIN and/or WIA drivers, which I believe all HP AIOs do (I'm not aware of any HP AIOs without TWAIN drivers). Regards, Joe
nobusAuthor Commented:
i've decided to try gimp and your suggestion - but how do i download devide scanned images.scm?
i got on the correct page - but it only opens the file  - maybe i have to copy the content into notepad, and save as scm +?
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
> how do i download devide scanned images.scm?

Look at Step 3 underneath the video Micro Tutorial:
That shows where to download it from and how to put it in your GIMP scripts folder (see Step 2, also).
nobusAuthor Commented:
yes - that's what i found, no problem -but i can't download it
as said - it just opens the content - i don't see any download option anywhere...
probably i overlook something - but what?
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Do a right-click on the DivideScannedImages.scm file (you may do that right here in this post), then a Save Link As (Firefox) or a Save link as (Chrome) or a Save linked content as (Opera) or a Save target as (IE) or something similar, depending on what browser you use.
nobusAuthor Commented:
thanks Joe - i guess i would never have found that without your help
strange thing is - the zip file just underneath is a normal download
ok - tomorrow first test scans
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
That's because .SCM is an unusual file type that your browser doesn't recognize, while .ZIP is a standard file type that your browser knows how to handle. Looking forward to hearing the results of your test scans tomorrow — it is working well here, but I'm very curious to see how it works for you.
nobusAuthor Commented:
just did a test scan - works ok
i had several contrast- poor images that were nit completely  recognised, the normal contrast ones are fine

to be continued - and already a big thank you !
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Glad to hear that the normal contrast ones are working fine. You may be able to do better with the poor contrast ones by changing the various parameters in the Divide Scanned Images dialog — I don't know that for a fact, but it's worth some experimentation.
nobusAuthor Commented:
n2fc  -you posted the same as Joe, but he followed up with more detail and help
Joe, the last couple of days it were the first "spring" days - 20°C, so i had other work in the garden.

to all : if anything pops up - i'll post a new question
nobusAuthor Commented:
Joe, i still have a problem
i have scanned 4 images in one scan
i set the batchdividescanned images as your example - but i cannot find how to save them
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
With DivideScannedImages, tick the box that says "Save and Close Extracted Images". With BatchDivideScannedImages, it should automatically load the images from the folder specified in the "Load from" box and put the divided images into the folder specified in the "Save Directory" box.
nobusAuthor Commented:
that's the problem - it does not do that, but i'll try without batch option, and see if that works better
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
With DivideScannedImages (not  BatchDivideScannedImages), you need to load the image into GIMP first, then run the filter. For troubleshooting, you could un-tick "Save and Close Extracted Images" and you should get a new GIMP window for each divided image. That way, you'll see if the filter is not splitting out the images into four separate ones, in which case you'll have to experiment with the various settings (in particular, the Selection Threshold and Size Threshold).
nobusAuthor Commented:
i see the 4 images - but are they not supposed to be saved automatic ?
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
> but are they not supposed to be saved automatic ?

Yes, if you tick the "Save and Close Extracted Images" box:

Save and Close Extracted Images
nobusAuthor Commented:
i'll look for it and let you know tomorrow
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Sounds good...I'll be here...but I'm in the US Central time zone, so I won't be online until later in your day.
nobusAuthor Commented:
ok  - i was confounded with the Batch divide; which i supposed i should use
the divide scanned images works ok, and saves the pictures ok

what's the use of the batch version then - if i may ask?  is that for opening and processing multiple pictures?
if that is so - i'll open a new Q for that
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
> what's the use of the batch version then - if i may ask?  is that for opening and processing multiple pictures?

Yes! BatchDivideScannedImages will process all of the image files of a specified file type (such as JPG) in the specified folder — in other words, its processing is based on these fields in its dialog:

batch divide dialog folder name and file type
DivideScannedImages (i.e., not the Batch one) will process only the file currently open in GIMP.

> if that is so - i'll open a new Q for that

I don't see a need for a new question — why do you want one? Regards, Joe
nobusAuthor Commented:
hey Joe -i was a bit quick; it scanned the first 4 pictures ok  -and saved them, but i can't get this one to save into 2 separate ones
maybe you can ?
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
> it scanned the first 4 pictures ok  -and saved them

Great news!

> can't get this one to save into 2 separate ones

It works with these settings:
Selection Threshold=25
Background Sample X Offset=20
Background Sample Y Offset=20

Here's my full dialog box:

settings for nobus divide
There may be other settings that work, too, but I tested those and it divided your image perfectly. Regards, Joe
RaminTechnical AdvisorCommented:
Two separated Photo for Nobus.

please find attached.
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
There are, of course, a ton of imaging products that you can use to split/crop manually. Is that what you did or did you use the DivideScannedImages filter in GIMP? If the former, that's not the point of this; if the latter, what settings did you use?

An addition to my last post. In general, I recommend experimenting with those three parameters. Sometimes it helps to set the Abort Limit (maximum number of images to be created) and/or the Size Threshold (the smallest size that will be considered an image, i.e., if either the width or height of a detected image is smaller than the Size Threshold, it will be ignored). But you can usually achieve successful splitting via tweaking just the first three params that I mentioned above.

Regards, Joe
RaminTechnical AdvisorCommented:

I just used Photoshop,  file menu > Automate > Crop and Straighten Photos.
it's an auto crop for multi pictures in a photo.

Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Hi Ramin,
Thanks for letting us know. That's the method that n2fc posted above (#a42043901) from here:
(which also, interestingly, has an updated version of DivideScannedImages that I've been experimenting with)

At that link, Solution 1 is the Photoshop method and the author, Francois Malan, says,
regularly screws up
Are you getting better results with Photoshop than Francois indicates? Regards, Joe
RaminTechnical AdvisorCommented:
No, I used Photoshop CC, but the result was not very accurate,  it needed a final edit to crop final photos exactly without no extra border.
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Thanks for the update, Ramin — good to know. Attached are the files created by using the DivideScannedImages filter in GIMP with the settings that I mentioned above. I did not edit the files in any way — they are the unmodified files that were auto-saved by the filter. Pretty good, imo. Regards, Joe
nobusAuthor Commented:
i fear i did not understand the meaning of the settings correct, so i'll try to gather a bit more info from you guys :
what do you think is meant with  : Selection and size treshold? Abort limit - X and Y offset ?

as a thank you to both of you, -i'm the smiling guy near the teacher - in black suit - in image 2
RaminTechnical AdvisorCommented:
Good looking,
nobusAuthor Commented:
i looked then a lot better than now    :=))
nobusAuthor Commented:
joe - your settings work here too
itsmainly the offset that did it
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
> i looked then a lot better than now

Didn't we all?! :)

> your settings work here too

Glad to hear it.

> mainly the offset that did it

Same here — in fact, only the offsets! If you leave all the defaults (do a Reset in the dialog) and change only the X-Y offsets, it works. Btw, I started my experimenting at 25 and that worked, then dropped it to 20, which also worked, but the default of 5 did not work, so I posted my results for you at that point. I just tried 10, which did not work, then 15, which did work. I was going to leave it at that, but my curiosity got the better of me, so I decided to find the magic number — turns out that 12 fails and 13 works! Of course, it's different for different images, which is why the author provided the various parameters, but it was interesting to see a real-world example. Fascinating stuff! Regards, Joe
nobusAuthor Commented:
yep - i've been experimenting too
if i do a full page scan  - the settigns differ greatly from the ones needed if i do a prescan (which limits the scan surface)
Joe Winograd, Fellow 2017DeveloperCommented:
Good stuff — very interesting! Keep the feedback coming!
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Printers and Scanners

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.